Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comClient Alert
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: June 17, 2025
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
Many trademark scammers send official looking letters or emails urging immediate action to pressure you to pay them money for your trademark or “additional” services you do not require. If you ever receive a notice asking for payment as to your trademark from any such company, DO NOT PAY IT. To all our clients, we will be your point contact at the trademark office, and all fees are paid through our firm.
With scams related to U.S. trademark filings becoming more common and sophisticated, it is important to be vigilant. Business fraud prevention strategies can help protect your intellectual property investments. Fraudulent trademark correspondence is so prevalent that the USPTO even has its own list of scammers. We have also included some examples below.
To appear legitimate, scammers often use official government data publicly available from USPTO records and have company names that sound like government agencies. While the information contained in these solicitations may be accurate (for example, that a filing is due to keep a registration active), using these private services is never a requirement of trademark registration. Understanding what are white collar crimes can help you recognize fraudulent schemes targeting trademark holders. While some services may be legitimate (i.e. assistance in responding to an office action), many others are not (i.e. offering to record trademarks in a private registry).
Other fraudulent solicitations purport to be official USPTO correspondence and often urge recipients to take prompt action to avoid losing their trademark rights. Remember for US marks, official correspondence will come from the USPTO headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia, and all emails will be from the domain “@uspto.gov.” Additionally, the USPTO does not issue invoices to trademark owners or ask them to pay fees by email or phone.
If you registered your trademark using an attorney or are represented by counsel in legal proceedings involving your trademark, communications will generally be sent directly to your attorney. Therefore, it is safe to assume that any correspondence purporting to be from the USPTO is fraudulent. How to conduct an effective internal business investigation can help you verify suspicious communications and protect your business interests.
Companies should also consider implementing effective arbitration agreements and business mediation strategies to handle disputes that may arise from fraudulent activities. The Federal Trade Commission’s guidance on avoiding scams provides additional resources for business owners.
Finally, we encourage clients to contact their Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney if there is any question of whether a communication from the USPTO or a third party is legitimate.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

As discussed in prior updates, Governor Hochul’s administration has proposed targeted adjustments to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) to reduce procedural delay for certain housing projects that do not present significant environmental impacts. These proposals are part of the Governor’s 2026 agenda and include targeted SEQRA exemptions, geographic eligibility limits, floodplain exclusions, and […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

New York State is pursuing a significant reform initiative aimed at reducing procedural delays associated with the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) for certain housing projects. The proposal, which is part of Governor Kathy Hochul’s 2026 State of the State agenda under the “Let Them Build” initiative, seeks to create targeted exemptions from SEQRA […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

On January 12, Governor Phil Murphy signed S4509 into law, ushering in a sweeping regulatory framework for hemp-derived cannabinoid products in New Jersey. The statute repeals prior provisions governing intoxicating hemp and aligns state law with newly enacted federal standards under 7 U.S.C. §1639o. This development marks a significant shift for manufacturers, retailers, and distributors […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

On December 11, 2025, President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order titled Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence (Executive Order). According to the Trump Administration, the goal is to create a uniform federal approach to AI policy and reduce conflicting rules across different states. For businesses operating in the AI industry, the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Senate Bill 21 This bill was enacted largely in response to high-profile litigation, such as In re Match Group (In re Match Grp., Inc. Deriv. Litig., 315 A.3d 446 (Del. 2024)) and TripAdvisor (Maffei v. Palkon, 2025 WL 384054 (Del. Feb. 4, 2025)) and to stem the recent tide of Delaware companies reincorporating in Neveda […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

The New York Corporate Transparency Act (NYCTA) WILL NOT apply to US-registered LLCs. In recent years, there has been significant interest in identifying the “beneficial owners” of U.S. businesses to combat perceived financial crimes such as money laundering, terrorism financing, and tax fraud by ending the use of anonymous shell companies. This led to the […]
Author: Scott H. Novak
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!