Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comClient Alert
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: June 17, 2025
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
Many trademark scammers send official looking letters or emails urging immediate action to pressure you to pay them money for your trademark or “additional” services you do not require. If you ever receive a notice asking for payment as to your trademark from any such company, DO NOT PAY IT. To all our clients, we will be your point contact at the trademark office, and all fees are paid through our firm.
With scams related to U.S. trademark filings becoming more common and sophisticated, it is important to be vigilant. Business fraud prevention strategies can help protect your intellectual property investments. Fraudulent trademark correspondence is so prevalent that the USPTO even has its own list of scammers. We have also included some examples below.
To appear legitimate, scammers often use official government data publicly available from USPTO records and have company names that sound like government agencies. While the information contained in these solicitations may be accurate (for example, that a filing is due to keep a registration active), using these private services is never a requirement of trademark registration. Understanding what are white collar crimes can help you recognize fraudulent schemes targeting trademark holders. While some services may be legitimate (i.e. assistance in responding to an office action), many others are not (i.e. offering to record trademarks in a private registry).
Other fraudulent solicitations purport to be official USPTO correspondence and often urge recipients to take prompt action to avoid losing their trademark rights. Remember for US marks, official correspondence will come from the USPTO headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia, and all emails will be from the domain “@uspto.gov.” Additionally, the USPTO does not issue invoices to trademark owners or ask them to pay fees by email or phone.
If you registered your trademark using an attorney or are represented by counsel in legal proceedings involving your trademark, communications will generally be sent directly to your attorney. Therefore, it is safe to assume that any correspondence purporting to be from the USPTO is fraudulent. How to conduct an effective internal business investigation can help you verify suspicious communications and protect your business interests.
Companies should also consider implementing effective arbitration agreements and business mediation strategies to handle disputes that may arise from fraudulent activities. The Federal Trade Commission’s guidance on avoiding scams provides additional resources for business owners.
Finally, we encourage clients to contact their Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney if there is any question of whether a communication from the USPTO or a third party is legitimate.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Recent reports indicate that President Trump is preparing to issue an executive order as early as Monday, December 15 directing his administration to finalize the long-anticipated reclassification of cannabis under the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) from Schedule I to Schedule III. This development follows years of regulatory review and political debate spanning multiple administrations […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

EPA Proposes Historic WOTUS Rule—A Major Victory for Predictability, Cost Savings, and Development Efficiency, Driven by the Supreme Court’s Sackett Ruling On November 20, 2025, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers published a Proposed Rule (Document 90 FR 52498) to redefine the “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) in […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

New Jersey developers and contractors may now benefit from the NJ sales tax exemption for contractors under a new law designed to support the construction and improvement of affordable housing projects. P.L. 2024, c.3 (effective May 1, 2024) expands an existing sales tax exemption to include contractors working for “housing sponsors engaged in affordable housing […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

The enactment of the Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act (H.R. 5371) on November 12, 2025, has fundamentally altered the legal foundation of the U.S. hemp industry. Embedded within this omnibus spending measure are revisions to the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, which itself was amended by the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (the 2018 Farm […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

Senate Bill S4876, the “New Jersey Energy Security and Affordability Act,” was introduced on November 17, 2025, by Senators Bob Smith and John Burzichelli. The bill establishes a comprehensive regulatory structure designed to support the development of advanced nuclear generation, expand distributed energy storage, and implement statewide demand-reduction programs. The bill cites rising electricity demand – […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

New York is preparing to roll out its own version of beneficial ownership reporting—and it arrives sooner than many businesses realize. Beginning January 1, 2026, the New York LLC Transparency Act (LLCTA) will impose new filing obligations on all New York LLCs and foreign LLCs authorized to do business in the state. While the LLCTA […]
Author: Scott H. Novak
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!