James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
AbbVie - Shire Deal Collapses, Calls For Corporate Tax Reform
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: October 27, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
Despite insisting a few months ago that his company’s upcoming merger with UK-based Shire was not for the tax impact, the CEO of U.S. pharmaceutical maker AbbVie blamed U.S. Treasury Department rules for its decision to shutter the deal.
AbbVie explained in a recent statement that its proposed merger with Shire had to been terminated as a result of new regulatory measures that were introduced by the Treasury Department to reduce the tax impact seen in corporate inversions, according to International Business Times. Inversions are the process by which U.S. multinationals acquire foreign competitors in order to merge with them. The new company is able to be located abroad, where it can enjoy a lower tax environment.
“The Company’s decision was based upon its assessment of the 22 September, 2014 notice issued by the US Department of Treasury, which re-interpreted longstanding tax principles in a uniquely selective manner designed specifically to destroy the financial benefits of these types of transactions,” an AbbVie spokesperson said in a statement, according to the news source. “The notice introduced an unacceptable level of risk and uncertainty given the magnitude of the proposed changes and the stated intention of the Department of Treasury to continue to revise tax principles to further impact such transactions.”
Quartz reported on the two key provisions included in the new regulations.
First, the regulations change how ownership is calculated in the inversion. Currently, the shareholders of the foreign company are required to own at least 20 percent of the new company. This is still the case, but the government now won’t allow “passive assets” like cash or securities, to be counted in the company’s value. It also won’t allow U.S. firms to pay large dividends to shareholders before an inversion in order to shrink their value.
Second, it is now more difficult for inverted companies to make use of the tax free money that they have accumulated overseas. A common practice among multinational companies is to keep money overseas so that it cannot be taxed by the U.S. government until it is repatriated. Foreign companies have no such difficulty. As per the new regulations, however, inverted multinationals will no longer be able to use this foreign money to make interest-free loans to their U.S. subsidiaries or move un-taxed cash stockpiles to the new foreign holding company.
“The unprecedented unilateral action by the US Department of Treasury may have destroyed the value in this transaction, but it does not resolve a critical issue facing American businesses today,” said AbbVie CEO Richard Gonzalez, according to IB Times. “The US tax code is outdated and is putting global US-based companies at a disadvantage to foreign competitors in an area of critical importance, specifically investing in the United States. Comprehensive tax reform is essential to create competitiveness and to stimulate investment in the economy.”
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
AbbVie - Shire Deal Collapses, Calls For Corporate Tax Reform
Author: James F. McDonough
Despite insisting a few months ago that his company’s upcoming merger with UK-based Shire was not for the tax impact, the CEO of U.S. pharmaceutical maker AbbVie blamed U.S. Treasury Department rules for its decision to shutter the deal.
AbbVie explained in a recent statement that its proposed merger with Shire had to been terminated as a result of new regulatory measures that were introduced by the Treasury Department to reduce the tax impact seen in corporate inversions, according to International Business Times. Inversions are the process by which U.S. multinationals acquire foreign competitors in order to merge with them. The new company is able to be located abroad, where it can enjoy a lower tax environment.
“The Company’s decision was based upon its assessment of the 22 September, 2014 notice issued by the US Department of Treasury, which re-interpreted longstanding tax principles in a uniquely selective manner designed specifically to destroy the financial benefits of these types of transactions,” an AbbVie spokesperson said in a statement, according to the news source. “The notice introduced an unacceptable level of risk and uncertainty given the magnitude of the proposed changes and the stated intention of the Department of Treasury to continue to revise tax principles to further impact such transactions.”
Quartz reported on the two key provisions included in the new regulations.
First, the regulations change how ownership is calculated in the inversion. Currently, the shareholders of the foreign company are required to own at least 20 percent of the new company. This is still the case, but the government now won’t allow “passive assets” like cash or securities, to be counted in the company’s value. It also won’t allow U.S. firms to pay large dividends to shareholders before an inversion in order to shrink their value.
Second, it is now more difficult for inverted companies to make use of the tax free money that they have accumulated overseas. A common practice among multinational companies is to keep money overseas so that it cannot be taxed by the U.S. government until it is repatriated. Foreign companies have no such difficulty. As per the new regulations, however, inverted multinationals will no longer be able to use this foreign money to make interest-free loans to their U.S. subsidiaries or move un-taxed cash stockpiles to the new foreign holding company.
“The unprecedented unilateral action by the US Department of Treasury may have destroyed the value in this transaction, but it does not resolve a critical issue facing American businesses today,” said AbbVie CEO Richard Gonzalez, according to IB Times. “The US tax code is outdated and is putting global US-based companies at a disadvantage to foreign competitors in an area of critical importance, specifically investing in the United States. Comprehensive tax reform is essential to create competitiveness and to stimulate investment in the economy.”