
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: January 4, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comAmerican Eagle and its sister company American Airlines will be allowed to move forward with new labor contracts following court approval of the restructured collective bargaining agreements.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Sean Lane gave permission to American Eagle and its unions to move forward with the new terms, marking another step forward in the company’s volatile bankruptcy proceedings. The approval applies to the airlines and their unions, including Transport Workers Union, Association of Flight Attendants-CWA and Air Line Pilots Association. American Eagle president and CEO Dan Garton said he is happy that this phase of the bankruptcy is over, and is eager to continue moving forward.
“His ruling paves the way for us to begin implementing the labor cost savings that are required for our successful restructuring,” Garton told employees following the ruling. “While the past year for the Eagle team has been extraordinarily challenging, we believe what we have accomplished positions us well for a bright future.”
Although the parties stated they are pleased with the new contracts, obstacles still remain as a likely merger with U.S. Airways is being discussed. The potential partnership has forced the airlines involved to more seriously discuss labor contract issues with U.S. Airways pilot unions, who indicated they are unhappy with their current contract. While the groups are exploring solutions to longstanding labor disputes with the pilots, they are engaging in heavier talks as the merger appears to be imminent.
American Eagle, American Airlines and parent company AMR Corp. filed for protection under bankruptcy law 13 months ago, and have been involved in several labor and contract disputes that have greatly hindered their restructuring efforts.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!