Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: January 17, 2025
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
All types of boundary disputes between property owners are complex and can easily become contentious. Whether you are a property owner, real estate developer, or otherwise involved in a boundary conflict, you need experienced legal guidance.
A boundary dispute is a disagreement about the exact location of a property’s border, which can lead to further conflicts over land ownership, usage, or possession. Boundary disputes can have a variety of causes, such as inaccurate land surveys, confusing boundary descriptions in a deed, the lack of marked boundary lines, or an unknown arrangement between previous property owners. They can also impact both residential and commercial property.
While boundary disputes can take many different forms, the majority of disputes fall into one of the following four categories:
While each state has their own adverse possession law, the essential elements of an adverse passion claim are similar. They include: open and notorious possession that gives reasonable notice to the true owner; possession that is hostile to the true owner, i.e. without permission of the true owner; and continuous and exclusive possession for a prescribed period of time. Some states require possession under the claim of right or color of title. Others also require that the adverse possessor pay all taxes associated with the real property.
If you can satisfy all of the requirements for adverse possession, you can file a lawsuit to quiet title to the property. For property owners, the best way to avoid an adverse possession claim against your property is to know where the legal boundary lines are and regularly check on any unused land to confirm that no one is regularly using it without your permission.
If you and a neighboring property owner disagree over the location of property boundary lines, it is important to act quickly, as laws governing adverse possession and other property rights often have strict deadlines.
In any boundary conflict, the first step should always be to verify that you do indeed have a dispute by locating the exact property boundaries. This generally involves hiring a licensed surveyor who will physically locate the boundary of your property based on the legal description contained in your deed. A title search is also advisable as it will identify all recorded documents in the chain of title of your property, including any easements or deeds that could affect your ownership interest in the property.
The types of boundary disputes can get a bit confusing but armed with this information, you can then seek to negotiate a resolution with the other party. If the dispute cannot be settled, legal action may be required. In most cases, a quiet title action may be filed to resolve title issues, boundary disputes, and claims of adverse possession. In a quiet title action, the court will determine the correct boundary lines and clarify the interests of the parties involved. The court may also award monetary damages requiring one party to compensate the other party for any losses, such as diminution in property value.
If you believe that someone is infringing upon your property rights, or if you are being accused of infringing a neighbor’s property rights, you need expert legal guidance. In many cases, we can help clients resolve boundary disputes without going to court, whether through negotiation, mediation, or arbitration. However, our seasoned real estate litigators are prepared to go the distance in every case. To find out how we can help resolve your boundary dispute, we encourage you to contact us today.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!