
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.com
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comAmid all of the recent news coverage of American multinational corporations inverting to redomicile in distant foreign countries, a massive deal is going down just next door. Burger King announced this morning that it reached a deal with Canadian fast food restaurant Tim Hortons, which primarily serves breakfast fare. If the proposed merger were to go through, the resultant company would be the world’s third-largest fast food restaurant chain, with a total of more than 18,000 outlets and roughly $22 billion in system sales.
At least part of this fervor likely comes from the plans to create a new, publicly traded company headquartered in Ontario Canada. Why Canada?
There are a number of benefits for Burger King in seeing this inversion through. First of all, Canada’s top corporate tax rate in Ontario is 26.5 percent, according to Forbes. This includes both the top federal rate of 15 percent and the provincial corporate tax rate of 11.5 percent, making for a significantly lower rate than the federal rate of 35 percent experienced by Burger King currently.
The hidden gem may be the Canadian treatment of a foreign affiliate’s “exempt surplus.” Dividends paid from exempt surplus are generally exempt from Canadian tax by virtue of a 100% dividends received deduction. Canada uses a combined exemption and credit system applies to dividends received from a foreign affiliate, including a Controlled Foreign Affiliate. Imagine all of the profits held offshore by US companies, such as Apple, Microsoft and Google escaping tax upon repatriation to the parent. Small wonder why Canada was chosen.
Burger King also operates in about 100 countries. This means that its earnings in foreign countries would be protected from the U.S. tax rate, as the U.S. is one of the only developed countries in the world to tax global income for corporations and individuals.
It is still too soon to tell what the long term effects of the Canadian government’s move will be.
Corporate tax inversion is an extremely hot topic right now in the United States, so much so, it has even spread into Canada. Frank Brunetti and I have been keeping up with this topic since the beginning. You can get involved and follow the story from some of our previous posts:
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!