James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
CFCs, Disregarded Entities, Partnerships and Subpart F Income.
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: January 23, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
Taxpayers adopt different structures when conducting business around. PLR 201330006 contains such an example where using various entities and the regulations avoids Subpart F inclusions.
A U.S. taxpayer was a “U.S. shareholder” in a foreign company, formed in country A, treated as a corporation for U.S. tax purposes (CFC). U.S. shareholders are required to take into income any Subpart F income of CFC. An unrelated company (“U”) and CFC owned all of the interests in a partnership (“P”). P, in turn, owned all of the disregarded entity (“DE”) for U.S. tax purposes. DE was building a plant and would operate it selling in country A all of its production pursuant to output contracts at a market price. P and DE were also formed in country A.
Whether the income generated by DE is Subpart F income requires an analysis of Foreign Base Company income, which consists of several categories. The relevant ones for this analysis include Foreign Personal Holding Company Income (“FPHCI”), foreign base company services income (FBC Services) performed for a related person, or foreign base company sales income (FBC Sales).
The general rule applied to a partnership distributive income is that it is Subpart F income if it would be so classified if the income is received by the CFC directly. Note the focus is on the activities or property of the CFC.
Three categories were analyzed. First, sales of DE’s output did not occur outside of country A, where CFC was incorporated. Therefore, there was no FBC Sales income. Second, FBC Services income is derived from substantial technical assistance provided by a related person outside of the country of organization of the CFC. Again, the technical assistance was rendered by P in country A where the CFC was formed. In each instance, the focus is on the characterization of the income as if it is received by the CFC directly. Third, FPHCI includes virtually all types of passive income but excludes commodities that are inventory, depreciable property and consumable supplies.
An exception to FPHCI treatment exists if the income would not be FPHCI if CFC earned the income directly, taking into account the activities and property of the partnership, not the CFC. The difference is that the activities of P, the partnership, are the focus, unlike FBC Sales and FBC Service where the test is applied as if the CFC received the income directly.
The plan used a corporation, partnership and disregarded entity to achieve the desired result of avoiding Subpart F income in the U.S. return
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
CFCs, Disregarded Entities, Partnerships and Subpart F Income.
Author: James F. McDonough
Taxpayers adopt different structures when conducting business around. PLR 201330006 contains such an example where using various entities and the regulations avoids Subpart F inclusions.
A U.S. taxpayer was a “U.S. shareholder” in a foreign company, formed in country A, treated as a corporation for U.S. tax purposes (CFC). U.S. shareholders are required to take into income any Subpart F income of CFC. An unrelated company (“U”) and CFC owned all of the interests in a partnership (“P”). P, in turn, owned all of the disregarded entity (“DE”) for U.S. tax purposes. DE was building a plant and would operate it selling in country A all of its production pursuant to output contracts at a market price. P and DE were also formed in country A.
Whether the income generated by DE is Subpart F income requires an analysis of Foreign Base Company income, which consists of several categories. The relevant ones for this analysis include Foreign Personal Holding Company Income (“FPHCI”), foreign base company services income (FBC Services) performed for a related person, or foreign base company sales income (FBC Sales).
The general rule applied to a partnership distributive income is that it is Subpart F income if it would be so classified if the income is received by the CFC directly. Note the focus is on the activities or property of the CFC.
Three categories were analyzed. First, sales of DE’s output did not occur outside of country A, where CFC was incorporated. Therefore, there was no FBC Sales income. Second, FBC Services income is derived from substantial technical assistance provided by a related person outside of the country of organization of the CFC. Again, the technical assistance was rendered by P in country A where the CFC was formed. In each instance, the focus is on the characterization of the income as if it is received by the CFC directly. Third, FPHCI includes virtually all types of passive income but excludes commodities that are inventory, depreciable property and consumable supplies.
An exception to FPHCI treatment exists if the income would not be FPHCI if CFC earned the income directly, taking into account the activities and property of the partnership, not the CFC. The difference is that the activities of P, the partnership, are the focus, unlike FBC Sales and FBC Service where the test is applied as if the CFC received the income directly.
The plan used a corporation, partnership and disregarded entity to achieve the desired result of avoiding Subpart F income in the U.S. return