
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: March 4, 2014

Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comReorganizations under IRC §368(a)(1)(F) (“F Reorganizations”) are mere changes in form, such as changing a state of incorporation. This change may be made for any number of reasons, although choice of law or no longer doing business in the state are common. F Reorganizations in the international context involve consideration of many more substantive issues.
One must consider international tax law as the backdrop. PLR 201328003 sets forth a factual background of a structure used in international settings. It involves a foreign entity that has several subsidiaries, all of whom are disregarded. Taxpayers may obtain a benefit from making the check-the-box election to convert a foreign business entity into an entity that is disregarded for federal income tax purposes (DRE). DREs allow taxpayers to navigate the complex world of international taxation more efficiently. Consider that Subpart F taxes income that is not derived from an active trade or business or is re-routed through or to tax advantaged jurisdictions. The essence of the Subpart F regime is the taxation of income that is not repatriated, for whatever reason, to the U.S. Another set of rules faced by corporations is the foreign tax credit (FTC). The U.S. taxes worldwide income, which includes income earned and taxed in foreign jurisdictions. The FTC brings with it certain computational difficulties and limitations.
Some complexity can be eliminated through the use of DRE. PLR 201328003 describes such a DRE structure that was crafted to adapt to these rules. Foreign parent (“FP”) owns Target which is formed under the laws of a foreign country. Target owns several subsidiaries. Target filed to domesticate itself in a state, which was a taxable transaction. Despite the inbound taxable event, the tiered subsidiaries were all disregarded entities. DREs are branches of the parent, in this case the Target. One of the unique features of DRE’s is that they allow what is, in effect, consolidated return groups to be formed across borders. The benefit of this feature is the ability of a corporation to combine activities of entities in several different countries to avoid, to a degree, Subpart F and FTC.
Some jurisdictions allow for cross-border consolidations and advertise this attractive feature. Although the U.S. does not permit consolidated groups to include non-U.S. companies, use of DRE’s accomplishes the same.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich

Commercial real estate trends in 2026 are being shaped by shifting economic conditions, technological innovation, and evolving tenant demands. As the market adjusts to changing interest rates, capital flows, and workplace models, investors, owners, tenants, and developers must understand how these trends are influencing opportunities and risk in the year ahead. Overall Outlook for Commercial […]
Author: Michael J. Willner

Part 2 – Tips Excluded from Income Certain employees and independent contractors may be eligible to deduct tips from their income for tax years 2025 through 2028 under provisions included in the One Big Beautiful Bill. The deduction is capped at $25,000 per year and begins to phase out at $150,000 of modified adjusted gross […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

Part 1 – Overtime Pay and Income Tax Treatment Overview This Firm Insights post summarizes one provision of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” related to the tax treatment of overtime compensation and related employer wage reporting obligations. Overtime Pay and Employee Tax Treatment The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) generally requires that overtime be paid […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

In 2025, New York enacted one of the most consequential updates to its consumer protection framework in decades. The Fostering Affordability and Integrity through Reasonable Business Practices Act (FAIR Act) significantly expands the scope and strength of New York’s long-standing consumer protection statute, General Business Law § 349, and alters the compliance landscape for New York […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!