
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: March 4, 2014

Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comReorganizations under IRC §368(a)(1)(F) (“F Reorganizations”) are mere changes in form, such as changing a state of incorporation. This change may be made for any number of reasons, although choice of law or no longer doing business in the state are common. F Reorganizations in the international context involve consideration of many more substantive issues.
One must consider international tax law as the backdrop. PLR 201328003 sets forth a factual background of a structure used in international settings. It involves a foreign entity that has several subsidiaries, all of whom are disregarded. Taxpayers may obtain a benefit from making the check-the-box election to convert a foreign business entity into an entity that is disregarded for federal income tax purposes (DRE). DREs allow taxpayers to navigate the complex world of international taxation more efficiently. Consider that Subpart F taxes income that is not derived from an active trade or business or is re-routed through or to tax advantaged jurisdictions. The essence of the Subpart F regime is the taxation of income that is not repatriated, for whatever reason, to the U.S. Another set of rules faced by corporations is the foreign tax credit (FTC). The U.S. taxes worldwide income, which includes income earned and taxed in foreign jurisdictions. The FTC brings with it certain computational difficulties and limitations.
Some complexity can be eliminated through the use of DRE. PLR 201328003 describes such a DRE structure that was crafted to adapt to these rules. Foreign parent (“FP”) owns Target which is formed under the laws of a foreign country. Target owns several subsidiaries. Target filed to domesticate itself in a state, which was a taxable transaction. Despite the inbound taxable event, the tiered subsidiaries were all disregarded entities. DREs are branches of the parent, in this case the Target. One of the unique features of DRE’s is that they allow what is, in effect, consolidated return groups to be formed across borders. The benefit of this feature is the ability of a corporation to combine activities of entities in several different countries to avoid, to a degree, Subpart F and FTC.
Some jurisdictions allow for cross-border consolidations and advertise this attractive feature. Although the U.S. does not permit consolidated groups to include non-U.S. companies, use of DRE’s accomplishes the same.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!