James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Charitable Bequest of a Business and the Problems That Follow
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: September 23, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
It is not difficult to leave a business to charity, one makes a bequest. The difficulty, however, arises from the administrative and compliance issues faced as a result of such a charitable bequest make it impractical in most instances. The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) imposes numerous restrictions on these tax practices and discourages non-profit organizations from competing directly against for-profit companies in commercial setting. (Imagine the competitive advantage you would have if your business were not subject to income tax.)
IRC §4943 prohibits private foundations from having excess business holdings in a business enterprise. A private foundation is a type of exempt organization that receives substantial support from only a few contributors or sources. Unlike many of the well-known public charities that receive contributions from thousands of people, a private foundation is controlled by a few substantial contributors. The IRC imposes tighter restrictions upon private foundations because of the absence of public oversight and de facto control by the contributors is suspect in the eyes of the IRS.
There are two exceptions. First, a business whose income is substantially (95% or more) passive in character. This makes sense because the IRC has the opportunity to tax a corporation that pays dividends, so there is no fear that business income will escape taxation.
The second exception is for a functionally related business (“FRB”) and it is rarely used. This is why PLR 201323029 is so interesting. FRB is defined as a business that is not an unrelated trade or business or is an activity which is carried on within a group of activities which are related to the exempt purpose of an organization. A classic example is a medical journal that reports on medical developments, but also contains medical advertising which is deemed related to the exempt purpose.
PLR 201323029 described an artist’s foundation that was dedicated to the creation and exhibition of art as well as art education. The artist’s business was held in a for-profit corporation. Upon the artist’s death, ownership of the corporation’s shares would pass to the foundation that would use the revenue to support its programs.
The usefulness of this PLR may be limited; however, it is important to notice that the foundations efforts to advance art were ongoing during the artist’s lifetime. It may have been helpful to obtaining the ruling that the charitable activities being conducted were already qualified and the applicant need only promise that they continue after death.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Charitable Bequest of a Business and the Problems That Follow
Author: James F. McDonough
It is not difficult to leave a business to charity, one makes a bequest. The difficulty, however, arises from the administrative and compliance issues faced as a result of such a charitable bequest make it impractical in most instances. The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) imposes numerous restrictions on these tax practices and discourages non-profit organizations from competing directly against for-profit companies in commercial setting. (Imagine the competitive advantage you would have if your business were not subject to income tax.)
IRC §4943 prohibits private foundations from having excess business holdings in a business enterprise. A private foundation is a type of exempt organization that receives substantial support from only a few contributors or sources. Unlike many of the well-known public charities that receive contributions from thousands of people, a private foundation is controlled by a few substantial contributors. The IRC imposes tighter restrictions upon private foundations because of the absence of public oversight and de facto control by the contributors is suspect in the eyes of the IRS.
There are two exceptions. First, a business whose income is substantially (95% or more) passive in character. This makes sense because the IRC has the opportunity to tax a corporation that pays dividends, so there is no fear that business income will escape taxation.
The second exception is for a functionally related business (“FRB”) and it is rarely used. This is why PLR 201323029 is so interesting. FRB is defined as a business that is not an unrelated trade or business or is an activity which is carried on within a group of activities which are related to the exempt purpose of an organization. A classic example is a medical journal that reports on medical developments, but also contains medical advertising which is deemed related to the exempt purpose.
PLR 201323029 described an artist’s foundation that was dedicated to the creation and exhibition of art as well as art education. The artist’s business was held in a for-profit corporation. Upon the artist’s death, ownership of the corporation’s shares would pass to the foundation that would use the revenue to support its programs.
The usefulness of this PLR may be limited; however, it is important to notice that the foundations efforts to advance art were ongoing during the artist’s lifetime. It may have been helpful to obtaining the ruling that the charitable activities being conducted were already qualified and the applicant need only promise that they continue after death.