Showing a pay-per-view event at your bar is something that can draw customers and increase revenue. But, be careful you may be violating copyright and trademark laws if you obtain the event improperly.
To increase the night’s pull, you may be tempted to broadcast such events via pay-per-view programming, which if not licensed properly, equates to an illegal stream – violating copyright and trademark laws. You should think twice before doing so, as it can come with numerous legal ramifications if caught.
The improper receipt and display of pay-per-view programming violates federal law prohibiting the unauthorized receipt of radio or television transmissions. If this unlawful broadcast provides “commercial advantage” or “private financial gain” the penalties are much worse.
Repercussions:
A fine as much as $100,000 or more
The possibility of imprisonment if a criminal conviction is obtained
Many bar owners may not know or understand the seriousness of illegally broadcasting pay-per-view events. However, ignorance is no excuse, especially in a time when companies are putting more of a focus on protecting copyrights.
“With these closed-circuit events, the promoters have a legitimate right to defend their agreements,” Anthony R. Caruso, Scarcini Hollenbeck sports and entertainment attorney, told the Los Angeles Times. “I do have sympathy for the bar owners, like I would have sympathy for the teenager who downloads music not really knowing it’s against the law.”
Bar owners are charged based on the size of their establishment for these events, so a large bar could face a hefty fee just to broadcast a boxing match. For example, a bar with up to 50 seats paid $1,600 for the recent Manny Pacquiao Timothy Bradley matchup. If you own a bar, you may see this fee and be overwhelmed, but just think of the $100,000+ fine you could face if caught illegally broadcasting an event.
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court.
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal
circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
