Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Detroit Pension Funds Challenge City's Bankruptcy Eligibility
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: January 10, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
The City of Detroit officially filed for Chapter 9 bankruptcy on July 18, 2013. It hasn’t been smooth sailing. Detroit’s two pension funds recently filed an application in the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals asking the court to expedite their appeal, which challenges Detroit’s bankruptcy eligibility, according to the Detroit Free Press.
On Dec. 3, the bankruptcy court ruled that Detroit was eligible to file for Chapter 9 bankruptcy protection. However, many creditors still object, and it is clear that the pension fund holders, in particular, are not ready to give up the issue.
“This court should decline the bankruptcy court’s puzzling invitation to delay this appeal, despite finding that its eligibility decision meets the criteria for an immediate direct appeal to this court,” the retirement systems say, in their request for an expedited hearing.
The General Retirement System and Police and Fire Retirement System are concerned that if Detroit’s bankruptcy proceedings move forward, the pension funds for employees will be slashed. According to Reuters, the two funds said that Michigan’s constitution protects pensions from being cut, which is the basis of the appeal. The two organizations also said that allowing this bankruptcy to move forward could set a precedent, leading other U.S. cities to cut pensions as a way to reduce debt.
However, this appeal could be in some trouble, as Bankruptcy Judge Steven Rhodes ruled that the city had met the requirements for being in bankruptcy and that the court needs to discuss the city’s debt adjustment plan without the distraction of any appeals.
- Practices: Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy Litigation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.