Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
EEOC Challenges Restrictive Separation Agreement
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: April 17, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has filed a lawsuit against CVS Pharmacy, Inc. alleging that the pharmacy chain’s standard separation agreement is “overly broad.” Specifically, the EEOC claims that the separation agreement interferes with a former employee’s right to communicate with the EEOC or to file discrimination charges. Employers should take note of this case because the form of agreement used by CVS is not unusual and is similar to the kind used by many other large employers.
The EEOC charges that the separation agreement requires that CVS be notified if the employee participates in an administrative investigation. It also requires the employee not to disparage CVS or its officers, directors or other employees. As a counterpoint, the agreement provides a single line that states that nothing in the terms of the agreement are intended to interfere with the employee’s right to participate in any legal proceeding or to participate with a government agency’s investigation.
The EEOC is seeking to permanently enjoin CVS from using the current version of the separation agreement, and the agency also seeks to prohibit the company from taking any other actions that may inhibit an employee’s right to file a charge.
Because the provisions under attack are commonly used by employers, this case is now on the radar of employment lawyers everywhere as it is feared to be an attack on virtually all separation agreements. Separation agreements play a very important role in helping an employer to secure peace and freedom from damaging lawsuits when an employee leaves his/her employment.
However, with a continuing poor economy, the EEOC has expressed concern that terminated employees are more likely to accept severance pay regardless of the terms of the severance agreement. As a result, the EEOC has begun to attack the standard terms of severance agreements as being unduly restrictive and prohibitive, resulting in its lawsuit against CVS.
The case is U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. CVS Pharmacy Inc., case number 1:14-cv-00863, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the use of separation agreements, please contact me, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
EEOC Challenges Restrictive Separation Agreement
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has filed a lawsuit against CVS Pharmacy, Inc. alleging that the pharmacy chain’s standard separation agreement is “overly broad.” Specifically, the EEOC claims that the separation agreement interferes with a former employee’s right to communicate with the EEOC or to file discrimination charges. Employers should take note of this case because the form of agreement used by CVS is not unusual and is similar to the kind used by many other large employers.
The EEOC charges that the separation agreement requires that CVS be notified if the employee participates in an administrative investigation. It also requires the employee not to disparage CVS or its officers, directors or other employees. As a counterpoint, the agreement provides a single line that states that nothing in the terms of the agreement are intended to interfere with the employee’s right to participate in any legal proceeding or to participate with a government agency’s investigation.
The EEOC is seeking to permanently enjoin CVS from using the current version of the separation agreement, and the agency also seeks to prohibit the company from taking any other actions that may inhibit an employee’s right to file a charge.
Because the provisions under attack are commonly used by employers, this case is now on the radar of employment lawyers everywhere as it is feared to be an attack on virtually all separation agreements. Separation agreements play a very important role in helping an employer to secure peace and freedom from damaging lawsuits when an employee leaves his/her employment.
However, with a continuing poor economy, the EEOC has expressed concern that terminated employees are more likely to accept severance pay regardless of the terms of the severance agreement. As a result, the EEOC has begun to attack the standard terms of severance agreements as being unduly restrictive and prohibitive, resulting in its lawsuit against CVS.
The case is U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. CVS Pharmacy Inc., case number 1:14-cv-00863, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the use of separation agreements, please contact me, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.