Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: December 26, 2018
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe federal government is looking to get back in the business of regulating sports betting in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court striking down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA). The Sports Wagering Market Integrity Act of 2018 would require states like New Jersey to meet minimum standards imposed by the Department of Justice (DOJ).

As detailed in greater depth in prior articles, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for New Jersey to authorize sports betting within the state. New Jersey first passed a law establishing a regulatory regime for legalized sports betting in 2012. However, the country’s major professional sports leagues and the NCAA filed a lawsuit, in which the Department of Justice joined. The suit alleged that New Jersey had violated PASPA, the federal law which expressly prohibited government entities, including the states, from authorizing sports wagering.
In Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, the Supreme Court agreed with New Jersey that PASPA was unconstitutional because it prohibited state authorization of sports wagering. “It is as if federal officers were installed in state legislative chambers and were armed with the authority to stop legislators from voting on any offending proposals,” Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr. wrote, “A more direct affront to state sovereignty is not easy to imagine.”
Following the Supreme Court’s decision, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island have legalized sports gambling. Several other states are also working to approve it. In New Jersey, sports betting is now authorized in New Jersey casinos and racetracks, as well as online.
According to a new report by consulting firm Eilers & Krejcik Gaming, New Jersey’s revenues from sports gambling will surpass Nevada’s as early as 2021. The report projects that New Jersey’s gaming industry will reap $442 million that year, while Nevada will take in $410 million.
As we enter 2019, additional regulatory hurdles could slow the growth of the sports gambling industry. On December 20, 2018, Sens. Orrin Hatch and Sen. Chuck Schumer introduced the Sports Wagering Market Integrity Act of 2018, which would establish federal oversight over the sports betting industry. Notably, Sen. Hatch was one of the authors of PASPA. “This bill is the first step towards ensuring that sports betting is done right in the states that choose to legalize it. Just as importantly, it provides protections for states that choose not to go down that path,” he said in a press statement.
As outlined by Sens. Hatch and Schumer, the Sports Wagering Market Integrity Act of 2018 would:
Importantly, the proposed bill would not require sports betting operators to pay an integrity fee to the major sports leagues and the NCAA. However, sports wagering operators would be required to use data provided or licensed by the leagues to determine the outcome of sports wagers, at least until 2024. At that point, the proposed legislation authorizes operators to use alternative forms of data, so long as they can demonstrate that it is sufficiently similar to the data provided by the leagues.
The NFL and NCAA have already voiced support for the Sports Wagering Market Integrity Act of 2018. “The Sports Wagering Market Integrity Act reaffirms the long-standing commitment of Congress to protecting the integrity of American athletics. We appreciate the bipartisan leadership demonstrated by Senators Hatch and Schumer in bringing forth this commonsense legislation, and we urge its swift enactment,” said Jocelyn Moore, National Football League Executive Vice President.
Not surprisingly, the sports betting industry favors a more “hands off” approach. In support, the American Gaming Association noted that the gaming industry already has a strict regulatory climate. “This bill is the epitome of a solution in search of a problem, representing an unprecedented and inappropriate expansion of federal involvement in the gaming industry,” said Sara Slane, Senior Vice President of Public Affairs for the American Gaming Association.
Given the upcoming leadership changes in Congress, it is unclear when and if the federal sports wagering bill will advance. We will, however, continue to closely monitor its progress. For businesses looking to enter New Jersey’s legal sports betting industry, we encourage you to work with a knowledgeable New Jersey business attorney who can help you navigate the regulatory framework.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Ashley Brinn, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

The Fort Monmouth redevelopment has entered its execution phase, and it is repositioning the broader Monmouth County real estate market. When Netflix and the Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority closed on the 292-acre Mega Parcel in December 2025, the transaction did more than hand over a deed. It marked the moment Fort Monmouth stopped being […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Owning a residential rental property in New Jersey involves more than finding tenants and collecting rent. Property owners must comply with a combination of state laws, municipal ordinances, building and housing codes, and zoning and land use regulations. These requirements can affect everything from the number of dwelling units permitted at a property to whether […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

The five most common real estate disputes are breach of contract claims, landlord-tenant conflicts, zoning and land use disagreements, construction claims, and boundary disputes. Understanding why each arises, and taking preventive steps early, can help property owners, tenants, developers, and investors avoid costly litigation. Key Takeaways: Real estate transactions are complex endeavors involving numerous parties […]
Author: Paul Grossman

Once a child turns 18, parents lose the automatic legal authority to make medical and financial decisions on their behalf, even if the child still lives at home or remains on the family’s insurance. Three documents close that gap: a durable power of attorney, a health care proxy or directive, and a HIPAA authorization. For […]
Author: George McGowan

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!