
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: January 17, 2014

Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comThe Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently released a letter outlining its regulatory and examination priorities for 2014. It should be considered “must read” material for all broker dealers.
Susan Axelrod, Executive Vice President, Regulatory Operations, said, “The purpose of this letter is to provide insight to the industry on specific areas of concern for our regulatory programs in the coming year. We encourage firms to use this guidance along with their own analysis to enhance their programs as we will be examining for strong controls and robust compliance efforts in these areas.”
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority letter addresses a wide range of issues, including business conduct, fraud, financial and operational concerns, and market regulation. Below are some of the highlights:
New to Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s exam priorities are so-called recidivist brokers, those who have a pattern of complaints or disclosures for sales practice abuses. The enhanced scrutiny means that firms should thoroughly investigate all new hires and have procedures in place for heightened supervision of brokers who may have questionable backgrounds. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority plans to use both its High Risk Broker initiative and its Broker Migration Model to focus its enforcement efforts.
In the wake of several high-profile data breaches impacting the financial industry, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority plans to assess the integrity of firms’ policies, procedures, and controls to protect sensitive customer data. Accordingly, firms should evaluate and test their current data protection procedures to detect and address any potential weaknesses.
As the market for initial public offerings (IPOs) continues to heat up, examiners will be keeping a close eye on firms entering the underwriting business or significantly expanding their activities in this area. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority specifically cites compliance with Rule 5131 which, among other things, prohibits quid pro quo allocations and “spinning,” and addresses the conduct of firms and associated persons in the areas of book-building, new issue pricing, penalty bids, trading and waivers of lock-up agreements, as primary concern.
Starting this year, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority will take enhanced steps to assess the funding and liquidity risks of regulated firms. Larger firms will be required to conduct liquidity stress tests, which will focus on the impact of a loss of funding for their proprietary positions, their repo book, settlement and depository payments, and funding of customer balances.
Citing algorithmic trading malfunctions that caused substantial market disruptions, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority plans to monitor whether firms’ testing and controls related to high-frequency trading (HFT) and other algorithmic trading strategies and trading systems are adequate in light of the Market Access Rule and firms’ other supervisory obligations. Oversight may be conducted through both examinations and targeted investigations, according to the letter.
Among other top concerns, the letter also addresses perennial favorites like suitability, conflicts of interest, complex products, and anti-money laundering efforts. Finally, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority has indicated that it will update its view on risk throughout the year, and registered firms should do the same.
If you have any questions about Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s 2014 regulatory and examination priorities, please feel free to fill out the comment section below.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!