
Angela A. Turiano
Partner
212-784-6915 aturiano@sh-law.com
Partner
212-784-6915 aturiano@sh-law.com
Known as the “Supervision Rule,” FINRA Rule 3110 requires brokerage firms to establish, maintain, and enforce a system to supervise the activities of their associated persons.
The rule stipulates that the system of supervision should be reasonably designed to achieve compliance with all applicable regulations established by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Compliance with FINRA Rule 3110 is critical for brokerage firms to effectively manage risk and avoid costly liability. Establishing a robust supervisory system, however, is not only a key regulatory obligation but also helps broker-dealers build trust with investors and strengthen their business practices.
In this article, we explain the key elements of Rule 3110, as well as upcoming amendments to the rule that firms should have on their radar.
FINRA Rule 3110 sets forth the requirements for effective risk management practices within brokerage firms. As referenced above, the Rule requires brokerage firms to have reasonably designed written supervisory procedures (WSPs) in place to identify, monitor, and mitigate risks associated with their business. Among other requirements, a firm’s WSPs must address the supervision of supervisory personnel and provide for the review of a firm’s investment banking and securities business, correspondence and internal communications, and customer complaints. WSPs must also detail the specific individual(s) responsible for each review; the supervisory activities such persons will perform; the frequency of the review; and the manner of documentation.
Below is a summary of five key requirements of FINRA Rule 3110:
Changes to FINRA Rule 3110 are on the horizon. As set forth in FINRA’s Regulatory Notice 24-02, a new rule will take effect on July 1, 2024, which will establish a voluntary, three-year remote inspections pilot program. Specifically, new Rule 3110.18 will allow eligible member firms to fulfill their inspection obligation of qualified branch offices (under Rule 3110(c)(1)) without an on-site visit to such offices or locations.
Another rule change becomes effective on June 1, 2024. Under new Rule 3110.19, FINRA will treat a private residence at which an associated person engages in specified supervisory activities, as a non-branch location, subject to certain safeguards and limitations. As a non-branch location, the newly defined residential supervisory location (or RSL) will be subject to inspections on a regular periodic schedule (presumed to be at least every three years) rather than the annual inspections currently required for an office of supervisory jurisdiction (OSJ) and “supervisory branch office.”
The recent decade-plus of relative calm in the market has allowed regulators to spend more time and resources on aggressive investigation and enforcement. As such, it is more important than ever that firms stay informed and ahead of the curve by adopting a supervisory framework in full compliance with all relevant rules and regulations. Effectively developing, implementing, and enforcing such a supervisory framework can be daunting, especially in such a challenging regulatory environment. As such, brokerage firms are strongly advised to work with experienced counsel. Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Regulatory Compliance Group is dedicated to helping firms achieve FINRA compliance in this challenging regulatory environment. We assist clients in building supervisory systems, navigating changes in supervisory obligations, and monitoring the effectiveness of their supervisory procedures to avoid enforcement efforts being directed at them.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!