Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: August 30, 2021
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is warning companies that it’s taking longer than normal to conduct merger reviews. While companies may elect to proceed with transactions without waiting for the agency to conclude its investigation, they are doing so at their own risk, according to the FTC.
Pursuant to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (HSR Act), companies proposing a merger or acquisition must notify regulators and satisfy a mandatory waiting period if the size of the parties involved and the value of a transaction exceeds certain filing thresholds, absent an applicable exemption. The current size-of-transaction threshold is $92 million.
Once the parties submit a Premerger Notification to the FTC and the Department of Justice (DOJ), the HSR Act generally gives the agencies 30 days to pursue an initial investigation and determine whether additional information is needed to evaluate the transaction. If the FTC or DOJ makes a “second request” seeking additional information, the transaction is placed on hold until the companies have fully complied with the request. Once the parties have provided all of the necessary information, the agency has a limited number of days to file a complaint challenging the proposed merger ahead of its consummation.
As set forth in a recent blog post, the FTC is currently struggling to meet these deadlines. “This year, the FTC has been hit by a tidal wave of merger filings that is straining the agency’s capacity to rigorously investigate deals ahead of the statutory deadlines,” the agency wrote.
According to the latest filing data, more than 1,700 Hart-Scott-Rodino pre-merger notices have been filed in the first six months of 2021. By comparison, the agencies received a little more than 2,000 filings in all of last year. While transactions were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, the average number of filings has typically been around 2,000 for the past several years.
Because the FTC is unable to fully investigate within the requisite timelines, it has started sending standard form letters alerting companies that the FTC’s investigation remains open and reminding companies that the agency may subsequently determine that the deal was unlawful. The FTC also warns that companies that choose to proceed with transactions that have not been fully investigated are doing so at their own risk. According to the FTC, “this action should not be construed as a determination that the deal is unlawful, just as the fact that we have not issued such a letter with respect to an HSR filing should not be construed as a determination that a deal is lawful.”
The FTC blog post includes a link to a sample pre-consummation warning letter. The letter emphasizes that the FTC and DOJ are authorized to determine that a merger is illegal even after the companies have merged and even if the merger was subject to premerger review. Thus, the agency maintains the right to challenge a deal regardless of whether it was initially investigated. The letter states, in relevant part:
Please be advised that if the parties consummate this transaction before the Commission has completed its investigation, they would do so at their own risk. Any inaction by the Commission before the expiration of the waiting period should not be construed as a determination regarding the lawfulness of the transaction. Indeed, no such determination could be made unless and until the Commission completes its investigation. The parties cannot stop the investigation or avoid an enforcement action by consummating. To the contrary, and in keeping with its commitment to aggressive enforcement, the Commission may challenge transactions— before or after their consummation—that threaten to reduce competition and harm consumers, workers, and honest businesses.
While a successful premerger review isn’t akin to a rubber stamp, it does provide companies with some assurance that the transaction won’t be challenged by the FTC or DOJ. Likewise, proceeding without waiting for the agencies’ investigation to conclude does come with risks. Accordingly, we encourage businesses contemplating an M&A transaction to work with a knowledgeable attorney who can guide them through the process and determine the best course of action, particularly when challenges like this arise.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Thomas Herndon, Jr., or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

When a company enters Chapter 11 bankruptcy, many assume the process will culminate in a lengthy reorganization plan. However, distressed businesses are increasingly being sold through a different mechanism — a sale under Section 363 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. A Section 363 sale allows a company, as a debtor-in-possession in bankruptcy, to sell […]
Author: John D. Giampolo

Before buying property, it is critical to determine whether local zoning laws may affect your plans. If you plan to redevelop the property, you will want to confirm that local zoning regulations permit development as intended. If acquiring property that is already developed, you must verify that the use is permitted in the underlying zoning […]
Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga

For parents of a child with a disability, estate planning raises concerns that go well beyond deciding who will inherit their assets. Parents may spend years making sure their child has the right care, services, and support. Eventually, they must also confront a difficult question: Who will take over when they can no longer do […]
Author: George McGowan

Before buying a New Jersey rental property, an investor should verify realistic operating numbers, the property’s legal and regulatory status, lead-based paint and flood compliance, the existing leases and tenant protections, and the right ownership structure. A rental property is more than a piece of real estate; it is an operating business subject to legal, […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

In New Jersey, an irrevocable trust can sometimes be modified even though its name suggests otherwise, and one of the primary tools for doing so is a process called decanting. Whether decanting is available depends on the specific terms of the trust and the discretion given to the trustee. Key takeaways: New Jersey has no […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Intellectual property valuation determines the monetary value of a business’s IP assets, and it drives outcomes in licensing deals, joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions, financing, and ownership disputes. The most valuable assets of a business are often the things that cannot be seen or touched: a proprietary process, a copyrighted work, brand recognition, or the […]
Author: Jay McDaniel
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!