The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is warning companies that it’s taking longer than normal to conduct merger reviews…
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is warning companies that it’s taking longer than normal to conduct merger reviews. While companies may elect to proceed with transactions without waiting for the agency to conclude its investigation, they are doing so at their own risk, according to the FTC.
FTC Facing Tidal Wave of Merger Filings
Pursuant to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (HSR Act), companies proposing a merger or acquisition must notify regulators and satisfy a mandatory waiting period if the size of the parties involved and the value of a transaction exceeds certain filing thresholds, absent an applicable exemption. The current size-of-transaction threshold is $92 million.
Once the parties submit a Premerger Notification to the FTC and the Department of Justice (DOJ), the HSR Act generally gives the agencies 30 days to pursue an initial investigation and determine whether additional information is needed to evaluate the transaction. If the FTC or DOJ makes a “second request” seeking additional information, the transaction is placed on hold until the companies have fully complied with the request. Once the parties have provided all of the necessary information, the agency has a limited number of days to file a complaint challenging the proposed merger ahead of its consummation.
As set forth in a recent blog post, the FTC is currently struggling to meet these deadlines. “This year, the FTC has been hit by a tidal wave of merger filings that is straining the agency’s capacity to rigorously investigate deals ahead of the statutory deadlines,” the agency wrote.
According to the latest filing data, more than 1,700 Hart-Scott-Rodino pre-merger notices have been filed in the first six months of 2021. By comparison, the agencies received a little more than 2,000 filings in all of last year. While transactions were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, the average number of filings has typically been around 2,000 for the past several years.
Because the FTC is unable to fully investigate within the requisite timelines, it has started sending standard form letters alerting companies that the FTC’s investigation remains open and reminding companies that the agency may subsequently determine that the deal was unlawful. The FTC also warns that companies that choose to proceed with transactions that have not been fully investigated are doing so at their own risk. According to the FTC, “this action should not be construed as a determination that the deal is unlawful, just as the fact that we have not issued such a letter with respect to an HSR filing should not be construed as a determination that a deal is lawful.”
The FTC blog post includes a link to a sample pre-consummation warning letter. The letter emphasizes that the FTC and DOJ are authorized to determine that a merger is illegal even after the companies have merged and even if the merger was subject to premerger review. Thus, the agency maintains the right to challenge a deal regardless of whether it was initially investigated. The letter states, in relevant part:
Please be advised that if the parties consummate this transaction before the Commission has completed its investigation, they would do so at their own risk. Any inaction by the Commission before the expiration of the waiting period should not be construed as a determination regarding the lawfulness of the transaction. Indeed, no such determination could be made unless and until the Commission completes its investigation. The parties cannot stop the investigation or avoid an enforcement action by consummating. To the contrary, and in keeping with its commitment to aggressive enforcement, the Commission may challenge transactions— before or after their consummation—that threaten to reduce competition and harm consumers, workers, and honest businesses.
Key Takeaway
While a successful premerger review isn’t akin to a rubber stamp, it does provide companies with some assurance that the transaction won’t be challenged by the FTC or DOJ. Likewise, proceeding without waiting for the agencies’ investigation to conclude does come with risks. Accordingly, we encourage businesses contemplating an M&A transaction to work with a knowledgeable attorney who can guide them through the process and determine the best course of action, particularly when challenges like this arise.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Thomas Herndon, Jr., or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
How the FTC’s Backlog Could Impact Your M&A Transaction
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is warning companies that it’s taking longer than normal to conduct merger reviews…
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is warning companies that it’s taking longer than normal to conduct merger reviews. While companies may elect to proceed with transactions without waiting for the agency to conclude its investigation, they are doing so at their own risk, according to the FTC.
FTC Facing Tidal Wave of Merger Filings
Pursuant to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (HSR Act), companies proposing a merger or acquisition must notify regulators and satisfy a mandatory waiting period if the size of the parties involved and the value of a transaction exceeds certain filing thresholds, absent an applicable exemption. The current size-of-transaction threshold is $92 million.
Once the parties submit a Premerger Notification to the FTC and the Department of Justice (DOJ), the HSR Act generally gives the agencies 30 days to pursue an initial investigation and determine whether additional information is needed to evaluate the transaction. If the FTC or DOJ makes a “second request” seeking additional information, the transaction is placed on hold until the companies have fully complied with the request. Once the parties have provided all of the necessary information, the agency has a limited number of days to file a complaint challenging the proposed merger ahead of its consummation.
As set forth in a recent blog post, the FTC is currently struggling to meet these deadlines. “This year, the FTC has been hit by a tidal wave of merger filings that is straining the agency’s capacity to rigorously investigate deals ahead of the statutory deadlines,” the agency wrote.
According to the latest filing data, more than 1,700 Hart-Scott-Rodino pre-merger notices have been filed in the first six months of 2021. By comparison, the agencies received a little more than 2,000 filings in all of last year. While transactions were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, the average number of filings has typically been around 2,000 for the past several years.
Because the FTC is unable to fully investigate within the requisite timelines, it has started sending standard form letters alerting companies that the FTC’s investigation remains open and reminding companies that the agency may subsequently determine that the deal was unlawful. The FTC also warns that companies that choose to proceed with transactions that have not been fully investigated are doing so at their own risk. According to the FTC, “this action should not be construed as a determination that the deal is unlawful, just as the fact that we have not issued such a letter with respect to an HSR filing should not be construed as a determination that a deal is lawful.”
The FTC blog post includes a link to a sample pre-consummation warning letter. The letter emphasizes that the FTC and DOJ are authorized to determine that a merger is illegal even after the companies have merged and even if the merger was subject to premerger review. Thus, the agency maintains the right to challenge a deal regardless of whether it was initially investigated. The letter states, in relevant part:
Please be advised that if the parties consummate this transaction before the Commission has completed its investigation, they would do so at their own risk. Any inaction by the Commission before the expiration of the waiting period should not be construed as a determination regarding the lawfulness of the transaction. Indeed, no such determination could be made unless and until the Commission completes its investigation. The parties cannot stop the investigation or avoid an enforcement action by consummating. To the contrary, and in keeping with its commitment to aggressive enforcement, the Commission may challenge transactions— before or after their consummation—that threaten to reduce competition and harm consumers, workers, and honest businesses.
Key Takeaway
While a successful premerger review isn’t akin to a rubber stamp, it does provide companies with some assurance that the transaction won’t be challenged by the FTC or DOJ. Likewise, proceeding without waiting for the agencies’ investigation to conclude does come with risks. Accordingly, we encourage businesses contemplating an M&A transaction to work with a knowledgeable attorney who can guide them through the process and determine the best course of action, particularly when challenges like this arise.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Thomas Herndon, Jr., or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
