
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: September 19, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comGateHouse Media, Inc., a company that owns more than 400 community newspapers and websites, announced its plans to seek bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
The publisher maintains operations in 20 U.S. states and brought in annual revenue of $489 million in 2012. However, declining sales and large printing expenditures since the 2008 financial crisis caused GateHouse’s financial performance to run into the red. The company lost $14.1 million on revenue of $119.6 million for the second quarter ending on June 30, 2013.
In a recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the company said it had reached an agreement with its largest creditor – Newcastle Investment Corp. – to restructure its $1.2 billion in debt in a pre-packaged bankruptcy filing. Newcastle, which currently owns 52 percent of GateHouse’s debt, recently acquired 33 Dow Jones Local Media publications for $87 million, and plans to merge the two enterprises into a publicly-traded company named New Media. The newly-published Local Media Group puts out publications in seven states and generated $162 million in revenues last year.
In a presentation to investors, Newcastle said that New Media’s projected revenue from digital content coupled with its reduced printing costs will put it in a position to invest more than $1 billion into the purchase of additional newspapers and publications over a three-year period, The Associated Press reports. Both GateHouse Media and Local Media Group put out daily and weekly publications.
Creditors have already announced their support for the pre-packaged reorganization plan, which will give them the option to convert their positions into either equity or cash at a price of 40 cents on the dollar, Newcastle said in statement. Newcastle will maintain a 59 percent stake of the new company which will amount to roughly $230 million.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!