
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.com
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comGenco Shipping & Trading Ltd., owned by New York shipping tycoon Peter Georgiopoulos, is planning to file for protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law in a debt-for-equity deal that the company has already reached with creditors, according to The Wall Street Journal. Genco now has until April 21 to file in order to stay in compliance with a default waivers agreement from lenders that will expire at that point.
Genco and its lenders are planning to enter bankruptcy with a prepackaged plan of reorganization, according to the news source. The agreement has the support of three groups of lenders and some of the company’s bondholders, who have pledged not to object to the plan. Should the plan be approved, Genco’s $1.06 billion credit facility will be converted into 81.1 percent equity in the new company. Convertible bondholders will receive 8.4 percent of Genco’s new equity, and current equity holders will receive seven-year warrants for 6 percent of the new equity at a $1.295 billion valuation.
Shares in the company have fallen 39 percent this year, according to Bloomberg Business. Genco deferred filing its annual report for 2013 because of the restructuring talks, but estimated a net loss of $157 million last year. In February, Genco hired Blackstone Group LP to advise it on a possible restructuring as a result of a supply glut in its industry that pushed rates down. In 2012, the company lost $158 million. In cash assets and equivalents, the company held $109.5 million in September of 2013.
Before the filing, shares rose by 1.3 percent to $1.53, according to the news source, suggesting some confidence in the deal.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!