
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: March 11, 2014

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comGold River businessman Steven Zinnel and his wife were divorced in 1999, and as proceedings dragged on, things got ugly. According to the Sacramento Bee, Zinnel told his wife in an angry email in 2001 that he intended to file for bankruptcy, and that she and the ex-couple’s two teenage children would get nothing. The problem is that Zinnel was a successful investor in electrical infrastructure and real estate, and in actuality, held millions of dollars in assets.
Zinnel filed for protection under Chapter 7 of the bankruptcy law in 2005, according to court documents. At the time, he and his attorney, who will also be sentenced, had hidden his assets by putting them in other people’s names, according to the Sacramento Bee, a practice that is highly illegal. In order to disguise his continued income, Zinnel and his attorney funneled money through shell companies so that he would not have to pay child support, which is calculated based on a formula in California, rather than being set by the courts.
Despite having apparently gotten away with the scheme “scot-free,” Zinnel called the FBI and requested an investigation of his ex-wife for allegedly trying to illegally access his private health insurance information, according to Time Magazine. Upon hearing his ex-wife’s side of the story, however, the FBI became much more interested in Zinnel’s bankruptcy filing, quickly unraveling the plot. As Judge Gregory Hollows put it, “having roused the beast, like the professor in Frankenstein, [Zinnel] was soon fighting off his own creation.”
In July 2013, Zinnel was convicted of 15 counts of bankruptcy fraud and money laundering, according to the news source. On March 5, he was ordered to forfeit $2.8 million in assets, pay $500,000 in fines and serve 17 years in prison. “You don’t lie before a court of law,” said Judge Troy Nunley of the U.S. Bankruptcy court in handing down the sentence. “You don’t continue to lie, which is what you did.”
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich

Commercial real estate trends in 2026 are being shaped by shifting economic conditions, technological innovation, and evolving tenant demands. As the market adjusts to changing interest rates, capital flows, and workplace models, investors, owners, tenants, and developers must understand how these trends are influencing opportunities and risk in the year ahead. Overall Outlook for Commercial […]
Author: Michael J. Willner

Part 2 – Tips Excluded from Income Certain employees and independent contractors may be eligible to deduct tips from their income for tax years 2025 through 2028 under provisions included in the One Big Beautiful Bill. The deduction is capped at $25,000 per year and begins to phase out at $150,000 of modified adjusted gross […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

Part 1 – Overtime Pay and Income Tax Treatment Overview This Firm Insights post summarizes one provision of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” related to the tax treatment of overtime compensation and related employer wage reporting obligations. Overtime Pay and Employee Tax Treatment The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) generally requires that overtime be paid […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

In 2025, New York enacted one of the most consequential updates to its consumer protection framework in decades. The Fostering Affordability and Integrity through Reasonable Business Practices Act (FAIR Act) significantly expands the scope and strength of New York’s long-standing consumer protection statute, General Business Law § 349, and alters the compliance landscape for New York […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!