Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Gold River businessman gets 17 years for bankruptcy fraud
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: March 11, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
Gold River businessman Steven Zinnel and his wife were divorced in 1999, and as proceedings dragged on, things got ugly. According to the Sacramento Bee, Zinnel told his wife in an angry email in 2001 that he intended to file for bankruptcy, and that she and the ex-couple’s two teenage children would get nothing. The problem is that Zinnel was a successful investor in electrical infrastructure and real estate, and in actuality, held millions of dollars in assets.
Zinnel filed for protection under Chapter 7 of the bankruptcy law in 2005, according to court documents. At the time, he and his attorney, who will also be sentenced, had hidden his assets by putting them in other people’s names, according to the Sacramento Bee, a practice that is highly illegal. In order to disguise his continued income, Zinnel and his attorney funneled money through shell companies so that he would not have to pay child support, which is calculated based on a formula in California, rather than being set by the courts.
Despite having apparently gotten away with the scheme “scot-free,” Zinnel called the FBI and requested an investigation of his ex-wife for allegedly trying to illegally access his private health insurance information, according to Time Magazine. Upon hearing his ex-wife’s side of the story, however, the FBI became much more interested in Zinnel’s bankruptcy filing, quickly unraveling the plot. As Judge Gregory Hollows put it, “having roused the beast, like the professor in Frankenstein, [Zinnel] was soon fighting off his own creation.”
In July 2013, Zinnel was convicted of 15 counts of bankruptcy fraud and money laundering, according to the news source. On March 5, he was ordered to forfeit $2.8 million in assets, pay $500,000 in fines and serve 17 years in prison. “You don’t lie before a court of law,” said Judge Troy Nunley of the U.S. Bankruptcy court in handing down the sentence. “You don’t continue to lie, which is what you did.”
- Practices: Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy Litigation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.