
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: March 11, 2014
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comGold River businessman Steven Zinnel and his wife were divorced in 1999, and as proceedings dragged on, things got ugly. According to the Sacramento Bee, Zinnel told his wife in an angry email in 2001 that he intended to file for bankruptcy, and that she and the ex-couple’s two teenage children would get nothing. The problem is that Zinnel was a successful investor in electrical infrastructure and real estate, and in actuality, held millions of dollars in assets.
Zinnel filed for protection under Chapter 7 of the bankruptcy law in 2005, according to court documents. At the time, he and his attorney, who will also be sentenced, had hidden his assets by putting them in other people’s names, according to the Sacramento Bee, a practice that is highly illegal. In order to disguise his continued income, Zinnel and his attorney funneled money through shell companies so that he would not have to pay child support, which is calculated based on a formula in California, rather than being set by the courts.
Despite having apparently gotten away with the scheme “scot-free,” Zinnel called the FBI and requested an investigation of his ex-wife for allegedly trying to illegally access his private health insurance information, according to Time Magazine. Upon hearing his ex-wife’s side of the story, however, the FBI became much more interested in Zinnel’s bankruptcy filing, quickly unraveling the plot. As Judge Gregory Hollows put it, “having roused the beast, like the professor in Frankenstein, [Zinnel] was soon fighting off his own creation.”
In July 2013, Zinnel was convicted of 15 counts of bankruptcy fraud and money laundering, according to the news source. On March 5, he was ordered to forfeit $2.8 million in assets, pay $500,000 in fines and serve 17 years in prison. “You don’t lie before a court of law,” said Judge Troy Nunley of the U.S. Bankruptcy court in handing down the sentence. “You don’t continue to lie, which is what you did.”
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Gold River businessman Steven Zinnel and his wife were divorced in 1999, and as proceedings dragged on, things got ugly. According to the Sacramento Bee, Zinnel told his wife in an angry email in 2001 that he intended to file for bankruptcy, and that she and the ex-couple’s two teenage children would get nothing. The problem is that Zinnel was a successful investor in electrical infrastructure and real estate, and in actuality, held millions of dollars in assets.
Zinnel filed for protection under Chapter 7 of the bankruptcy law in 2005, according to court documents. At the time, he and his attorney, who will also be sentenced, had hidden his assets by putting them in other people’s names, according to the Sacramento Bee, a practice that is highly illegal. In order to disguise his continued income, Zinnel and his attorney funneled money through shell companies so that he would not have to pay child support, which is calculated based on a formula in California, rather than being set by the courts.
Despite having apparently gotten away with the scheme “scot-free,” Zinnel called the FBI and requested an investigation of his ex-wife for allegedly trying to illegally access his private health insurance information, according to Time Magazine. Upon hearing his ex-wife’s side of the story, however, the FBI became much more interested in Zinnel’s bankruptcy filing, quickly unraveling the plot. As Judge Gregory Hollows put it, “having roused the beast, like the professor in Frankenstein, [Zinnel] was soon fighting off his own creation.”
In July 2013, Zinnel was convicted of 15 counts of bankruptcy fraud and money laundering, according to the news source. On March 5, he was ordered to forfeit $2.8 million in assets, pay $500,000 in fines and serve 17 years in prison. “You don’t lie before a court of law,” said Judge Troy Nunley of the U.S. Bankruptcy court in handing down the sentence. “You don’t continue to lie, which is what you did.”
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!