Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Gold River businessman gets 17 years for bankruptcy fraud
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: March 11, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
Gold River businessman Steven Zinnel and his wife were divorced in 1999, and as proceedings dragged on, things got ugly. According to the Sacramento Bee, Zinnel told his wife in an angry email in 2001 that he intended to file for bankruptcy, and that she and the ex-couple’s two teenage children would get nothing. The problem is that Zinnel was a successful investor in electrical infrastructure and real estate, and in actuality, held millions of dollars in assets.
Zinnel filed for protection under Chapter 7 of the bankruptcy law in 2005, according to court documents. At the time, he and his attorney, who will also be sentenced, had hidden his assets by putting them in other people’s names, according to the Sacramento Bee, a practice that is highly illegal. In order to disguise his continued income, Zinnel and his attorney funneled money through shell companies so that he would not have to pay child support, which is calculated based on a formula in California, rather than being set by the courts.
Despite having apparently gotten away with the scheme “scot-free,” Zinnel called the FBI and requested an investigation of his ex-wife for allegedly trying to illegally access his private health insurance information, according to Time Magazine. Upon hearing his ex-wife’s side of the story, however, the FBI became much more interested in Zinnel’s bankruptcy filing, quickly unraveling the plot. As Judge Gregory Hollows put it, “having roused the beast, like the professor in Frankenstein, [Zinnel] was soon fighting off his own creation.”
In July 2013, Zinnel was convicted of 15 counts of bankruptcy fraud and money laundering, according to the news source. On March 5, he was ordered to forfeit $2.8 million in assets, pay $500,000 in fines and serve 17 years in prison. “You don’t lie before a court of law,” said Judge Troy Nunley of the U.S. Bankruptcy court in handing down the sentence. “You don’t continue to lie, which is what you did.”
- Practices: Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy Litigation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Legal Issues Before Bringing on Investors
Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher
SECURE 2.0 RMD Planning Strategies
How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
Buying Commercial Property in New Jersey: Legal Guide for Small Businesses
Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.
The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities
On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Common Legal Mistakes NYC and New Jersey Business Owners Make
Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Founders Can Learn From Start-up Suits
High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.