
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: December 31, 2019
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comThe Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Conference of State Bank Supervisors recently issued a statement making it easier for banks to provide services to hemp businesses.
Prior to the 2018 Farm Bill, financial institutions were required to file suspicious activity reports for accounts associated with hemp-related businesses. Under new guidance, hemp businesses can be treated like any other business.
Signed into law on December 20, 2018 the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (2018 Farm Bill) removed hemp as a Schedule I controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). The term “hemp” is defined in the 2018 Farm Bill as “the plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of that plant, including the seeds thereof and all derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers, whether growing or not, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol [THC] concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis.”
The 2018 Farm Bill directed the U.S. Department of Agriculture to establish a hemp production regulatory plan. On October 31, 2019, the USDA issued an interim final rule establishing the domestic hemp production regulatory program to facilitate the legal production of hemp. Under the interim final rule, state departments of agriculture and tribal governments may submit plans for monitoring and regulating the domestic production of hemp to the USDA for approval. The interim final rule establishes a federal licensing plan for regulating hemp producers in states and tribal territories that do not have their own USDA-approved plans. Among other provisions, the interim final rule includes requirements for maintaining information on the land where hemp is produced, testing hemp for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) levels, disposing of plants with more than 0.3 percent THC, and licensing for hemp producers.
In their joint guidance, entitled “Providing Financial Services to Customers Engaged in Hemp-Related Businesses,” the four federal agencies clarify the requirements for providing financial services to hemp-related businesses under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). It specifically emphasizes that banks are no longer required to file suspicious activity reports (SAR) for customers solely because they are engaged in the growth or cultivation of hemp in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
“Because hemp is no longer a Schedule I controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act, banks are not required to file a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) on customers solely because they are engaged in the growth or cultivation of hemp in accordance with applicable laws and regulations,” the guidance states. “For hemp-related customers, banks are expected to follow standard SAR procedures, and file a SAR if indicia of suspicious activity warrants.”
The federal agencies further advise that bank customers engaged in hemp-related business activities are responsible for complying with the requirements set forth in the 2018 Farm Bill8 and applicable regulations. The guidance also highlights that financial institutions can decide whether to offer services to the hemp industry. “When deciding to serve hemp-related businesses, banks must comply with applicable regulatory requirements for customer identification, suspicious activity reporting, currency transaction reporting, and risk-based customer due diligence, including the collection of beneficial ownership information for legal entity customers,” it states.
The financial regulators also indicated that additional guidance is forthcoming. The statement indicates that FinCEN plans to issue additional guidance after further reviewing and evaluating the USDA interim final rule. The USDA is accepting public comment on the proposed Domestic Hemp Production Program until December 30, 2019, although an extension of that deadline is possible.
The new guidance is welcome news for the cannabis industry, which has struggled to gain access to financial services. However, as the agencies emphasize, marijuana is still a controlled substance under federal law. Accordingly, existing federal guidance still applies when providing banking services to marijuana businesses. The memo expressly notes that “[i]n the context of marijuana-related businesses, banks should continue following FinCEN guidance FIN-2014-G001 – BSA Expectations Regarding Marijuana-Related Businesses.”
For the greater cannabis industry, the Secure and Fair Enforcement Banking Act (SAFE Act) is likely the best hope. Passed by the U.S. House of Representatives on September 25, 2019, the bill seeks to increase access to financial institutions. It specifically prohibits federal banking regulators from terminating or limiting the deposit insurance or share insurance of a depository institution solely because the institution provides financial services to a legitimate marijuana-related business. It also provides that banking regulators may not prohibit or otherwise discourage a depository institution from offering financial services to cannabis businesses.
The SAFE Act currently has 33 cosponsors, as well as the endorsement of major financial sector lobbying groups, including the American Bankers Association, the Independent Community Bankers of America, and the Credit Union National Association. However, given that many Republicans are still opposed to relaxing the country’s marijuana laws, its likelihood of passage in the Senate is unclear.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Conference of State Bank Supervisors recently issued a statement making it easier for banks to provide services to hemp businesses.
Prior to the 2018 Farm Bill, financial institutions were required to file suspicious activity reports for accounts associated with hemp-related businesses. Under new guidance, hemp businesses can be treated like any other business.
Signed into law on December 20, 2018 the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (2018 Farm Bill) removed hemp as a Schedule I controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). The term “hemp” is defined in the 2018 Farm Bill as “the plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of that plant, including the seeds thereof and all derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers, whether growing or not, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol [THC] concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis.”
The 2018 Farm Bill directed the U.S. Department of Agriculture to establish a hemp production regulatory plan. On October 31, 2019, the USDA issued an interim final rule establishing the domestic hemp production regulatory program to facilitate the legal production of hemp. Under the interim final rule, state departments of agriculture and tribal governments may submit plans for monitoring and regulating the domestic production of hemp to the USDA for approval. The interim final rule establishes a federal licensing plan for regulating hemp producers in states and tribal territories that do not have their own USDA-approved plans. Among other provisions, the interim final rule includes requirements for maintaining information on the land where hemp is produced, testing hemp for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) levels, disposing of plants with more than 0.3 percent THC, and licensing for hemp producers.
In their joint guidance, entitled “Providing Financial Services to Customers Engaged in Hemp-Related Businesses,” the four federal agencies clarify the requirements for providing financial services to hemp-related businesses under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). It specifically emphasizes that banks are no longer required to file suspicious activity reports (SAR) for customers solely because they are engaged in the growth or cultivation of hemp in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
“Because hemp is no longer a Schedule I controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act, banks are not required to file a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) on customers solely because they are engaged in the growth or cultivation of hemp in accordance with applicable laws and regulations,” the guidance states. “For hemp-related customers, banks are expected to follow standard SAR procedures, and file a SAR if indicia of suspicious activity warrants.”
The federal agencies further advise that bank customers engaged in hemp-related business activities are responsible for complying with the requirements set forth in the 2018 Farm Bill8 and applicable regulations. The guidance also highlights that financial institutions can decide whether to offer services to the hemp industry. “When deciding to serve hemp-related businesses, banks must comply with applicable regulatory requirements for customer identification, suspicious activity reporting, currency transaction reporting, and risk-based customer due diligence, including the collection of beneficial ownership information for legal entity customers,” it states.
The financial regulators also indicated that additional guidance is forthcoming. The statement indicates that FinCEN plans to issue additional guidance after further reviewing and evaluating the USDA interim final rule. The USDA is accepting public comment on the proposed Domestic Hemp Production Program until December 30, 2019, although an extension of that deadline is possible.
The new guidance is welcome news for the cannabis industry, which has struggled to gain access to financial services. However, as the agencies emphasize, marijuana is still a controlled substance under federal law. Accordingly, existing federal guidance still applies when providing banking services to marijuana businesses. The memo expressly notes that “[i]n the context of marijuana-related businesses, banks should continue following FinCEN guidance FIN-2014-G001 – BSA Expectations Regarding Marijuana-Related Businesses.”
For the greater cannabis industry, the Secure and Fair Enforcement Banking Act (SAFE Act) is likely the best hope. Passed by the U.S. House of Representatives on September 25, 2019, the bill seeks to increase access to financial institutions. It specifically prohibits federal banking regulators from terminating or limiting the deposit insurance or share insurance of a depository institution solely because the institution provides financial services to a legitimate marijuana-related business. It also provides that banking regulators may not prohibit or otherwise discourage a depository institution from offering financial services to cannabis businesses.
The SAFE Act currently has 33 cosponsors, as well as the endorsement of major financial sector lobbying groups, including the American Bankers Association, the Independent Community Bankers of America, and the Credit Union National Association. However, given that many Republicans are still opposed to relaxing the country’s marijuana laws, its likelihood of passage in the Senate is unclear.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!