
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: August 28, 2014

Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comIn an International Monetary Fund Working Paper published recently, Ruud De Mooij and Ikuo Saito discussed the effects of the Japanese government’s upcoming corporate tax cut. The current Japanese tax on corporate income is 35 percent – on par with the American tax. After the cut, Japan’s rate will be reduced to 30 percent, leaving America’s corporate income tax as one of the highest in the developed world.
The IMF’s annual Article IV consultation with Japan noted the need for the country to lay out a concrete, medium-term plan to reduce its debt, according to Tax-News. Even if another consumption tax increase were to be implemented in 2015, Japan’s gross debt-to-GDP ratio would remain over 240 percent. The IMF concurred with Japan that a cut in the corporate tax rate could lift investment and economic growth in the consultation, but cautioned that this cut would not be self-financing. The Fund concluded that Japan should only proceed with such a measure if other measures were taken to offset the resultant revenue loss.
In the IMF working paper and an accompanying blog post on iMFdirect, de Mooij and Saito explained that there is actually limited room for expansion of the Japanese corporate income tax base.
Why should we care? A growing number of American politicians and corporations are calling for a reduction in the U.S. tax code that is at least equal to, if not greater than, the one the Japanese are implementing. In many of these arguments, the work of Arthur Laffer is referenced, specifically “Laffer curves.” In this context, the reference is to the idea that a sufficiently high tax rate actually reduces revenues because of its extreme distortionary effects.
Some proponents of the corporate income tax cut in Japan have also referenced Laffer, suggesting that a reduction in the tax rate would lead to a sufficient expansion in the Japanese base that revenues will ultimately increase without the need for offsetting measures, according to de Mooij and Saito. While the U.S. is lucky to have the chance to watch a similar reduction in the tax code go into effect, the IMF writers caution in their Working Paper that empirical literature on corporate tax elasticities suggest that there will be a far more modest effect on the base.
As a corporate tax attorneys, Frank L. Brunetti and I often write about topics such as international tax trends, corporate tax cuts, corporate income tax, and corporate inversions. If you want to learn more about these areas of tax, trusts, and estates take a look at some of our previous posts:
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!