
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: August 28, 2014

Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comIn an International Monetary Fund Working Paper published recently, Ruud De Mooij and Ikuo Saito discussed the effects of the Japanese government’s upcoming corporate tax cut. The current Japanese tax on corporate income is 35 percent – on par with the American tax. After the cut, Japan’s rate will be reduced to 30 percent, leaving America’s corporate income tax as one of the highest in the developed world.
The IMF’s annual Article IV consultation with Japan noted the need for the country to lay out a concrete, medium-term plan to reduce its debt, according to Tax-News. Even if another consumption tax increase were to be implemented in 2015, Japan’s gross debt-to-GDP ratio would remain over 240 percent. The IMF concurred with Japan that a cut in the corporate tax rate could lift investment and economic growth in the consultation, but cautioned that this cut would not be self-financing. The Fund concluded that Japan should only proceed with such a measure if other measures were taken to offset the resultant revenue loss.
In the IMF working paper and an accompanying blog post on iMFdirect, de Mooij and Saito explained that there is actually limited room for expansion of the Japanese corporate income tax base.
Why should we care? A growing number of American politicians and corporations are calling for a reduction in the U.S. tax code that is at least equal to, if not greater than, the one the Japanese are implementing. In many of these arguments, the work of Arthur Laffer is referenced, specifically “Laffer curves.” In this context, the reference is to the idea that a sufficiently high tax rate actually reduces revenues because of its extreme distortionary effects.
Some proponents of the corporate income tax cut in Japan have also referenced Laffer, suggesting that a reduction in the tax rate would lead to a sufficient expansion in the Japanese base that revenues will ultimately increase without the need for offsetting measures, according to de Mooij and Saito. While the U.S. is lucky to have the chance to watch a similar reduction in the tax code go into effect, the IMF writers caution in their Working Paper that empirical literature on corporate tax elasticities suggest that there will be a far more modest effect on the base.
As a corporate tax attorneys, Frank L. Brunetti and I often write about topics such as international tax trends, corporate tax cuts, corporate income tax, and corporate inversions. If you want to learn more about these areas of tax, trusts, and estates take a look at some of our previous posts:
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich

Commercial real estate trends in 2026 are being shaped by shifting economic conditions, technological innovation, and evolving tenant demands. As the market adjusts to changing interest rates, capital flows, and workplace models, investors, owners, tenants, and developers must understand how these trends are influencing opportunities and risk in the year ahead. Overall Outlook for Commercial […]
Author: Michael J. Willner

Part 2 – Tips Excluded from Income Certain employees and independent contractors may be eligible to deduct tips from their income for tax years 2025 through 2028 under provisions included in the One Big Beautiful Bill. The deduction is capped at $25,000 per year and begins to phase out at $150,000 of modified adjusted gross […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

Part 1 – Overtime Pay and Income Tax Treatment Overview This Firm Insights post summarizes one provision of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” related to the tax treatment of overtime compensation and related employer wage reporting obligations. Overtime Pay and Employee Tax Treatment The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) generally requires that overtime be paid […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

In 2025, New York enacted one of the most consequential updates to its consumer protection framework in decades. The Fostering Affordability and Integrity through Reasonable Business Practices Act (FAIR Act) significantly expands the scope and strength of New York’s long-standing consumer protection statute, General Business Law § 349, and alters the compliance landscape for New York […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!