Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 13, 2020
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comA new rule regarding electronic trademark application submissions will take effect on February 15, 2020. To ensure that your submissions to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) are accepted, it is important to understand the new requirements.

Under the USPTO’s final rule, trademark applicants and registrants will be required to file trademark applications and related documents using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). The USPTO’s goal is to make the trademark registration process entirely electronic.
The rule also requires the designation of an email address for receiving USPTO correspondence concerning these submissions, which will be either that of the applicant or registrant (if unrepresented) or an authorized attorney. Trademark applicants and registrants must also provide and maintain an accurate postal address to ensure that the USPTO can contact them if their email correspondence address doesn’t work.
There are some exceptions to the requirement to file electronically through TEAS. One involves submissions under the Trademark Law Treaty (TLT) and the Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks (STLT). Nationals of TLT members that are not also members of STLT at the time of submission of the relevant document are not required to file electronically or receive communications from the USPTO via email.
The rule also allows for physical specimens to be submitted separately when it is not possible to submit them using TEAS given the nature of the mark. For instance, if the application or registration is for a scent or flavor mark, because the required specimen must show use, or continued use, of the scent or flavor, it cannot be uploaded electronically. In that situation, the applicant may submit the application through TEAS and indicate that it is mailing the specimen to the USPTO.
An applicant or registrant may file a petition to the Director requesting acceptance of a submission filed on paper in three situations: (1) when TEAS is unavailable on the date of the deadline for the submission; (2) when the party timely filed a paper submission, but is unable to resubmit the document electronically by the deadline; and (3) when an extraordinary circumstance prevented the party from submitting the document electronically.
Going forward, trademark owners should regularly monitor the USPTO’s electronic systems, particularly after filing a submission to the USPTO. It is also important to keep your contact information up-to-date.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Kristin Garris, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

When a family member can no longer make important decisions for themself, the question is often not whether the family will step in, but whether they have the legal authority to do so. A spouse may manage household finances, or an adult child may arrange medical care and pay bills. Still, informal assistance does not […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

New Jersey residential developers with affordable housing obligations should carefully review their existing approvals, development agreements, and proposed deed restrictions in light of the State’s revised UHAC regulations (Uniform Housing Affordability Controls). The regulations, which took effect on November 6, 2025, significantly change the administration and physical requirements for affordable housing units. For developers with […]
Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga

A “no comment” response is sometimes the right call when a legal problem arises. As a blanket policy, however, it lets allegations go unanswered, deadlines pass, evidence disappear, and manageable disputes grow into expensive litigation. The businesses that fare best are usually the ones that say little publicly while acting decisively behind the scenes. When […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Utility-scale battery energy storage systems (BESS) are becoming an increasingly important component of the electric grid throughout New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. As renewable generation expands, electricity demand increases and grid operators seek greater flexibility, battery storage can help balance supply and demand while providing additional capacity and reliability. For developers, battery storage presents […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

A falling out between partners can be disastrous for any business. In many cases, the partnership will not survive. If you are in an unworkable situation with your partners, it may be time to consult a partnership dispute lawyer experienced in handling partnership breakups and dissolutions before the situation deteriorates any further. It is easy […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

When a company enters Chapter 11 bankruptcy, many assume the process will culminate in a lengthy reorganization plan. However, distressed businesses are increasingly being sold through a different mechanism — a sale under Section 363 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. A Section 363 sale allows a company, as a debtor-in-possession in bankruptcy, to sell […]
Author: John D. Giampolo
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!