Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 23, 2016
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe IRS updated its list of “Bad Banks” last month, which is now up to 95 banking institutions. This list will continue to grow as Swiss banks and foreign financial institutions come under more intense scrutiny from the Department of Justice to force public disclosure. So if your client’s bank is on the list, he or she should be made aware that the current Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program penalty is now 50 percent. It is vital to disclose all necessary information before it is too late.

The IRS increased the offshore disclosure penalty percentage from 27.5 percent to 50 percent last year, according to Professor Frank L. Brunetti’s Tax News blog. What this meant was that taxpayers could avoid the 50 percent offshore disclosure penalty if they submit a pre-clearance letter to the IRS before a financial institution came under investigation for public disclosure. But the penalties for not submitting this pre-clearance letter before a public disclosure are strict.
For instance, let’s say your client has assets in a foreign bank account valued at $3 million and an additional $4 million in offshore real estate purchased with the assets from that offshore account. That $7 million would be subject to a 50 percent penalty, which would be $3.5 million. This is significant because the previous 27.5 percent would have still been a substantial amount, but only $1,925,000. So your client would be required to pay an additional $1,575,000. No small chunk of change. Especially when you consider that there is also the risk that during the investigation your client could lose the OVDP criminal amnesty – all because you client did not submit a pre-clearance letter.
Certainly it is no secret that Swiss banks figure prominently in the top 10 on the IRS list of “Bad Banks” and this is partly due to the settlement reached between the Department of Justice and the Swiss banking system in 2014. This settlement led to the public disclosure of more than 300 U.S. account holders with more than $2 trillion in assets within the Swiss banking system. Needless to say, the Swiss are expected to continue to be a target of the IRS and the Department of Justice in the coming years.
One thing your client needs to consider is that the IRS will not accept ignorance as a plea anymore, regardless of where your client owes taxes on those assets. In addition, if you yourself have come to find that your bank is on this “Bad Banks” list, consult an experienced tax attorney for advice.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

New Jersey residential developers with affordable housing obligations should carefully review their existing approvals, development agreements, and proposed deed restrictions in light of the State’s revised UHAC regulations (Uniform Housing Affordability Controls). The regulations, which took effect on November 6, 2025, significantly change the administration and physical requirements for affordable housing units. For developers with […]
Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga

A “no comment” response is sometimes the right call when a legal problem arises. As a blanket policy, however, it lets allegations go unanswered, deadlines pass, evidence disappear, and manageable disputes grow into expensive litigation. The businesses that fare best are usually the ones that say little publicly while acting decisively behind the scenes. When […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Utility-scale battery energy storage systems (BESS) are becoming an increasingly important component of the electric grid throughout New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. As renewable generation expands, electricity demand increases and grid operators seek greater flexibility, battery storage can help balance supply and demand while providing additional capacity and reliability. For developers, battery storage presents […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

A falling out between partners can be disastrous for any business. In many cases, the partnership will not survive. If you are in an unworkable situation with your partners, it may be time to consult a partnership dispute lawyer experienced in handling partnership breakups and dissolutions before the situation deteriorates any further. It is easy […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

When a company enters Chapter 11 bankruptcy, many assume the process will culminate in a lengthy reorganization plan. However, distressed businesses are increasingly being sold through a different mechanism — a sale under Section 363 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. A Section 363 sale allows a company, as a debtor-in-possession in bankruptcy, to sell […]
Author: John D. Giampolo

Before buying property, it is critical to determine whether local zoning laws may affect your plans. If you plan to redevelop the property, you will want to confirm that local zoning regulations permit development as intended. If acquiring property that is already developed, you must verify that the use is permitted in the underlying zoning […]
Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!