James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Judge Authorizes IRS to Seek Bank Records From UBS
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: February 1, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The IRS is within its rights to request financial records from UBS of U.S. taxpayers suspected of hiding their income in accounts with Swiss bank Wegelin, a court ruled.
U.S. District Judge William Pauley granted the Internal Revenue Service a motion to issue a “John Doe” summons – which requests information about possible tax fraud committed by individuals whose identities are not known – on UBS. Following the guilty plea and subsequent closure of Switzerland’s oldest bank Wegelin, which admitted to helping U.S. clients skirt their U.S. tax law obligations, Pauley said that the IRS request was valid, as many UBS taxpayers may have hidden their income at Wegelin and other Swiss banks.
Following the ruling, a UBS spokesperson that the bank would comply with the request, and offer up information on U.S. clients. However, it noted that it would only provide U.S. records, not Swiss ones, to the federal tax agency, according to Reuters.
Although UBS was previously absolved of its own tax law violations in 2009 after it admitted to helping Americans evade taxes and agreed to a $780 million settlement, its association with Wegelin has put it back in the spotlight. Wegelin pleaded guilty on January 3 to helping U.S. clients hide income in secret accounts, and became the first foreign bank to be indicted by the U.S. A spokesman for the bank also raised eyebrows and make other banks nervous when he admitted that facilitating tax evasion was a common practice among many financial institutions. The 271-year-old institution agreed to pay $57.8 million in fines.
Wegelin is just the latest bank on the list of Swiss institutions the IRS is examining in connection with tax evasion as it seeks to crackdown on the misuse of offshore accounts and close the federal tax gap.
- Practices: Tax and Trusts & Estates, Corporate Transactions & Business
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.