Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 26, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
Earlier this month, President Barak Obama signed the “Protecting Affordable Coverage for Employees Act of 2015,” otherwise known as the PACE Act. The new law redefines the term “small” employers with respect to determining whether employers must provide health coverage for their employees within the Affordable Care Act.
Under most state laws, employers with one to 50 employees are considered small employers, while employers with 51 to 100 employees are considered large employers. The Affordable Care Act deviated from this standard by categorizing employers with 51 to 100 employees as small employers. However, prior January 1, 2016, states had the option to continue to treat them as large employers.
The definition is important for Affordable Care Act compliance because large and small employers are treated very differently under the Affordable Care Act. Health insurance offered in the small group market must meet certain requirements that do not apply to the large group market, including the requirement to cover ten “essential health benefits” and provide plans that plans that fall into the actuarial value levels (platinum, gold, silver, and bronze) established by the Affordable Care Act. These requirements, along with several others, have made purchasing insurance more costly for small employers.
The PACE Act curtails the expansion of the definition of “small employer” under the Affordable Care Act. Instead, it authorizes states to define the small employer market within their jurisdiction for employers of up to 100 individuals. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the new law will result in a net reduction in health premiums for insurance purchased by firms with between 51 and 100 employees.
Most states, including New Jersey, elected to delay the expansion of the definition of “small employer” through 2016. Accordingly, the state is expected to continue to define small employers as those with less than 50 workers. The path forward for states like New York, which already adopted the expanded definition, is less clear.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!