Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 26, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comEarlier this month, President Barak Obama signed the “Protecting Affordable Coverage for Employees Act of 2015,” otherwise known as the PACE Act. The new law redefines the term “small” employers with respect to determining whether employers must provide health coverage for their employees within the Affordable Care Act.
Under most state laws, employers with one to 50 employees are considered small employers, while employers with 51 to 100 employees are considered large employers. The Affordable Care Act deviated from this standard by categorizing employers with 51 to 100 employees as small employers. However, prior January 1, 2016, states had the option to continue to treat them as large employers.
The definition is important for Affordable Care Act compliance because large and small employers are treated very differently under the Affordable Care Act. Health insurance offered in the small group market must meet certain requirements that do not apply to the large group market, including the requirement to cover ten “essential health benefits” and provide plans that plans that fall into the actuarial value levels (platinum, gold, silver, and bronze) established by the Affordable Care Act. These requirements, along with several others, have made purchasing insurance more costly for small employers.
The PACE Act curtails the expansion of the definition of “small employer” under the Affordable Care Act. Instead, it authorizes states to define the small employer market within their jurisdiction for employers of up to 100 individuals. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the new law will result in a net reduction in health premiums for insurance purchased by firms with between 51 and 100 employees.
Most states, including New Jersey, elected to delay the expansion of the definition of “small employer” through 2016. Accordingly, the state is expected to continue to define small employers as those with less than 50 workers. The path forward for states like New York, which already adopted the expanded definition, is less clear.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!