Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: April 4, 2016
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
If there’s one thing audiences have seen repeatedly on reality television shows, it is people getting hurt.
Programs such as “Naked and Afraid” and “Deadliest Catch” depict people in dangerous and even life-threatening situations. Other times, bystanders are caught up in the action in ways they would prefer not to be. Depending on the various situations that reality TV stars and the people who cross their paths find themselves in, there may be different legal solutions or expectations. For example, some reality TV shows may feature people breaking the law, such as an episode of “Intervention” in which Pam, an alcoholic featured on the show, decided to drive drunk.
When Pam got into her car and drove off, the TV crew members did little to stop her, and however one may look at that decision ethically, legally it was completely within their rights to let her drive away drunk, The New York Times reported. In these situations, the staff members on the scene are treated like witnesses. In the U.S., there is no law requiring witnesses to get involved in a crime, such as drunk driving. Since producers aren’t legally required to stop crimes in progress or save people from dangerous situations, it is difficult to hold them legally responsible for the behavior of reality TV stars.
A&E, the television network behind “Intervention,” told the media outlet that the show has never been sued. This, despite the fact that it often features people in dangerous situations, is due to its focus on drug and alcohol use. The show’s producers do take steps to avoid being accused of negligence, however, such as keeping a family member on call and having potential subjects undergo evaluations.
Other times, reality TV stars don’t just put themselves in danger, though. The producers of the MTV television show “Jersey Shore” have been sued more than once after cast members were involved in fights. One lawsuit was dropped after the defendant, Sammi Giancola, left the jurisdiction – Florida. Giancola, or “Sammi Sweetheart,” was accused of punching a woman. In another case, a Superior Court judge from Toms River allowed RICO and assault charges to stand against MTV, the show’s producers and the crew.
While networks and producers aren’t required to step in when a crime is being committed, they can certainly be pulled into a lawsuit when someone not involved with the television show ends up getting hurt. The “Jersey Shore” cast’s many run-ins with the law can attest to the possibility that bystanders file lawsuits against reality TV stars, producers and networks. If nothing else, these cases can result in bad publicity. At the time the “Jersey Shore” was on the air, MTV was subjected to numerous attacks by groups opposed to show’s content.
“Liability depends on whether reality TV stars are employees.”
Other times, cast members themselves are hurt or placed in dangerous situations. In these cases, where it isn’t the individuals themselves who create the dangerous circumstance – such as Pam drunk driving – legal responsibility comes down to whether reality TV stars are employees or independent contractors, according to the Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law. If cast members are deemed to be employees, they are legally entitled to workers compensation should they get hurt on the job. Additionally, some state labor laws may allow further protections.
While there are multiple factors used to determine whether or not someone is an employee, the degree of control the employer holds over the individual is important in regards to reality TV. Some television shows, such as “Survivor,” require plenty of control over participants. While others, that follow cast members more than ask them to perform stunts or compete, have less control, which could make regularly appearing personalities independent contractors.
Whatever the situation, reality TV stars frequently find themselves in potentially dangerous situations whether they are stranded on desert islands or drinking in a New Jersey club.
For more information on whether networks and producers are liable for an injury in a specific situation, speak with an experienced entertainment law attorney.
Otherwise, for related articles dealing with reality TV and networks and producers, check out:
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!