Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: August 27, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comAre you aware that there is a compliance deadline set for September 23, 2013 that may apply to your business? When originally passed, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) introduced new rules regarding the use and disclosure of a patient’s personal health information (“PHI”). Over the years, unless your business was directly involved in providing healthcare services, HIPAA compliance probably was not on your compliance radar. A law passed in 2009 and known as “HITECH” will now change that perspective for some businesses.
To better understand HIPAA’s application, it is important to understand some important terms:
“Personal Health Information” (“PHI”) is defined to be any health information of an identifiable individual that is transmitted by electronic media, maintained in any electronic medium or transmitted or maintained in any other form or medium. For example, all administrative, financial, and clinical information on a patient is deemed to be PHI. Any information that identifies who the health-related information belongs to (i.e. names, email addresses, phone numbers, medical record numbers, photos, drivers license numbers, etc.) is also PHI. “ePHI” is merely PHI that is stored or transmitted electronically (i.e. via email, text message, web site, database, online document storage, electronic FAX, etc.).
“Covered Entities” include:
“Business Associates” are entities (other than a Covered Entity’s workforce) who store and exchange PHI data via computers through intranets, Internet, dial up modems, DSL lines, T-1, etc. and who create, receive, maintain or transmit PHI on behalf of a Covered Entity to perform certain enumerated functions, including claims processing, data analysis, utilization review, quality assurance, patient safety activities, billing, benefit management, practice management, legal, actuarial, accounting, consulting, data aggregation, management, administrative, accreditation or financial services and data transmission services if routine access to data is required; and subcontractors of Business Associates.
HIPAA also sets Privacy and Security Rules that focus on information safeguards and requires Covered Entities to implement all necessary and appropriate means to secure and protect PHI. Specifically, these rules impose organizational and administrative requirements along with technical and physical safeguards. HIPAA’s Privacy Rules set standards for protecting the rights of individuals (patients). Individuals are assured the right to PHI privacy and confidentiality. Further, PHI is subject to restrictions on proper use and disclosure. This extends to securing more reliable information systems to protect ePHI from being lost or hacked.
The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (“HITECH”) is part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) which provides specific incentives designed to accelerate the adoption of electronic health record (EHR) systems among Health Care Providers. HITECH will soon extend HIPAA compliance requirements to all Business Associates, including Business Associates of Business Associates.
Before HITECH, privacy and security requirements were imposed on Business Associates through agreements with Covered Entities. HITECH and recent “Omnibus Rules” will now directly require Business Associates to comply with HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules or face penalties of $100 to $50,000 per violation.
Among other things, Business Associates must execute Business Associate Agreements (“BAAs”) agreeing to comply with the Privacy and Security Rules by September 23, 2013 (this may be extended to 2014 where there is a BAA already in place). The Omnibus Rules will also require Covered Entities to execute BAAs with certain entities that were not previously considered to be Business Associates, such as data storage companies and other entities that provide data transmission services requiring access to the data on a routine basis.
BAAs often present model language prescribed by the government. Business Associates should consider the inclusion of additional or alternative terms that minimize legal exposure, such as:
These suggestions are just for starters. As things inevitably evolve, Covered Entities and Business Associates should be reviewing the law’s requirements and managing the risks that the law creates. For now, meeting the September 23rd deadline, if applicable, must be the first goal.
If you have any questions about the compliance deadline or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Gary Young, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!