Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

New HIPAA/HITECH Compliance Deadline of September 23, 2013

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: August 27, 2013

Key Contacts

Back

Are you aware that there is a compliance deadline set for September 23, 2013 that may apply to your business? When originally passed, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) introduced new rules regarding the use and disclosure of a patient’s personal health information (“PHI”). Over the years, unless your business was directly involved in providing healthcare services, HIPAA compliance probably was not on your compliance radar. A law passed in 2009 and known as “HITECH” will now change that perspective for some businesses.

To better understand HIPAA’s application, it is important to understand some important terms:

“Personal Health Information” (“PHI”) is defined to be any health information of an identifiable individual that is transmitted by electronic media, maintained in any electronic medium or transmitted or maintained in any other form or medium. For example, all administrative, financial, and clinical information on a patient is deemed to be PHI. Any information that identifies who the health-related information belongs to  (i.e. names, email addresses, phone numbers, medical record numbers, photos, drivers license numbers, etc.) is also PHI. “ePHI” is merely PHI that is stored or transmitted electronically (i.e. via email, text message, web site, database, online document storage, electronic FAX, etc.).

“Covered Entities” include:

  • Health plans: With certain exceptions, an individual or group plan that provides or pays the cost of medical care.
  • Health care clearinghouses: An entity that either processes or facilitates the processing of health information from various organizations,  i.e. to reformat or process the data into standard formats.
  • Health care providers: Care, services, or supplies related to the health of an individual, including (1) preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, rehabilitative, maintenance, or palliative care, and counseling, service, assessment, or procedures with respect to the physical or mental condition, or functional status, of an individual that affects the structure or function of the body; and (2) the sale or dispensing of a drug, device, equipment, or other item in accordance with a prescription.

“Business Associates” are entities (other than a Covered Entity’s workforce) who store and exchange PHI data via computers through intranets, Internet, dial up modems, DSL lines, T-1, etc. and who create, receive, maintain or transmit PHI on behalf of a Covered Entity to perform certain enumerated functions, including claims processing, data analysis, utilization review, quality assurance, patient safety activities, billing, benefit management, practice management, legal, actuarial, accounting, consulting, data aggregation, management, administrative, accreditation or financial services and data transmission services if routine access to data is required; and subcontractors of Business Associates.

HIPAA also sets Privacy and Security Rules that focus on information safeguards and requires Covered Entities to implement all necessary and appropriate means to secure and protect PHI. Specifically, these rules impose organizational and administrative requirements along with technical and physical safeguards.  HIPAA’s Privacy Rules set standards for protecting the rights of individuals (patients). Individuals are assured the right to PHI privacy and confidentiality. Further, PHI is subject to restrictions on proper use and disclosure.  This extends to securing more reliable information systems to protect ePHI from being lost or hacked.

The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (“HITECH”) is part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) which provides specific incentives designed to accelerate the adoption of electronic health record (EHR) systems among Health Care Providers.  HITECH will soon extend HIPAA compliance requirements to all Business Associates, including Business Associates of Business Associates.

Before HITECH, privacy and security requirements were imposed on Business Associates through agreements with Covered Entities. HITECH and recent “Omnibus Rules” will now directly require Business Associates to comply with HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules or face penalties of $100 to $50,000 per violation.

Among other things, Business Associates must execute Business Associate Agreements (“BAAs”) agreeing to comply with the Privacy and Security Rules by September 23, 2013 (this may be extended to 2014 where there is a BAA already in place). The Omnibus Rules will also require Covered Entities to execute BAAs with certain entities that were not previously considered to be Business Associates, such as data storage companies and other entities that provide data transmission services requiring access to the data on a routine basis.

BAAs often present model language prescribed by the government.  Business Associates should consider the inclusion of additional or alternative terms that minimize legal exposure, such as:

  • Prohibiting Covered Entities from asking the Business Associate to take any action that would violate the HIPAA Rules.
  • Authorizing termination of the BAA if the Covered Entity agrees to new restrictions that materially harm the Business Associate’s ability to perform or costs of performance.
  • Alternatively, permitting the Business Associate to recover costs associated with such additional restrictions or requirements.
  • Eliminating or limiting any proposed insurance or indemnification agreements.
  • Waiving or limiting damages.

These suggestions are just for starters.  As things inevitably evolve, Covered Entities and Business Associates should be reviewing the law’s requirements and managing the risks that the law creates.  For now, meeting the September 23rd deadline, if applicable, must be the first goal.

If you have any questions about the compliance deadline or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Gary Young, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work. 

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable? post image

Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?"
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery post image

How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery"
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore post image

The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore"
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers post image

BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers"
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected? post image

IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?"
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next post image

Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!