Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
New SEC Technology to Focus on Suspicious Corporate Disclosures
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: February 26, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is increasingly turning to technology to help root out fraud. The agency recently announced plans to launch a new computer software program that will detect accounting anomalies in corporate disclosures submitted to the regulator.
The new data driven approach is expected to bolster the SEC’s risk assessment process when it comes to accounting fraud. Under the “Accounting Quality Model” (AQM), the SEC will be able to analyze a company’s financial disclosures and assign a specific risk score, which will be used to identify outliers. “It is a model that allows us to discern whether a registrant’s financial statements stick out from the pack,” Craig M. Lewis, Chief Economist and Director, Division of Risk, Strategy, and Financial Innovation, stated in a recent speech.
In many ways, AQM is similar to the agency’s “Aberrational Performance Inquiry” initiative, which focuses on hedge fund advisers. Performance that is flagged as inconsistent with a fund’s investment strategy or other benchmarks forms a basis for further investigation and scrutiny. The program has resulted in several successful enforcement cases against advisers since it was first launched in 2011.
However, unlike the program targeting advisers, the SEC plans to use AQM across the SEC to assess the degree to which registrants’ financial statements appear anomalous. As Lewis notes, the data it churns out can be useful to a number of groups within the SEC. For instance, the Office of Compliance, Inspections, and Examinations could use these analytics during registrant examinations, and the Enforcement Division could use the analytics to focus their investigative process.
As this new program highlights, the SEC is committed to making good use of the wealth of information it collects. Therefore, it is even more important for regulated entities to devote significant time, money, and effort to compliance activities.
If you have any questions about the SEC’s new analytical tools or would like to discuss how they may impact your compliance activities, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business, Financial Services & Regulatory Practice
- Locations: New York City, Red Bank, NJ, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.