Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

The New Tax Law Introduces Qualified Business Income - The New Panacea

Author: James F. McDonough

Date: January 4, 2018

Key Contacts

Back

No Provision in the New Tax Law has Received More Attention Than the New Section 199A, Which Defines the New Term “Qualified Business Income”

No provision in the new tax law has received more attention than the new section 199A. Section 199A defines a new term called “Qualified Business Income” (“QBI”) and further provides non-corporate taxpayers, including trusts and estates, will be entitled to receive a deduction for a percentage of QBI. The 20% deduction is not an itemized deduction from adjusted gross income, rather it is allowed as a deduction reducing taxable income.

The New Tax Law Introduces Qualified Business Income (QBI)
Photo courtesy of Qusai Akoud (Unsplash.com)

QBI is the net amount of “qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss” received from any qualified trade or business of the taxpayer that is a partnership, S corporation or sole proprietorship to the extent that the items are effectively connected with a business within the United States (a “Qualified Trade or Business” or “QTB”).   A non-corporate taxpayer receiving QBI is entitled to deduct:

  • the lesser of the “combined qualified business income amount” of the taxpayer, or (b) 20% of the excess, if any, of the taxable income of the taxpayer for the tax year over the sum of net capital gain and the aggregate amount of the qualified cooperative dividends of the taxpayer for the tax year;

Plus

  • the lesser of: (i) 20% of the aggregate amount of the qualified cooperative dividends of the taxpayer for the tax year, or (ii) taxable income (reduced by the net capital gain) of the taxpayer for the tax year.

Definitions Within Definitions

The rub is that there are definitions within definitions and understanding the 20% deduction is navigable only if you have patience.

The “combined qualified business income amount” means the deductible amount for each qualified trade or business of the taxpayer (defined as 20% of the taxpayer’s QBI subject to the W-2 wage limitation discussed below; plus (ii) 20% of the aggregate amount of qualified real estate investment trust (REIT) dividends and qualified publicly traded partnership income of the taxpayer for the tax year. QBI does not include reasonable compensation paid to the taxpayer; any guaranteed payment to a partner for services to QTB under (Section 707(c)); or a payment by the QTB under (Section. 707(a)) to a partner for services to the QTB or any specified investment items. Thus, all income is not necessarily QBI.

A QTB is any trade or business except that of an employee or a specified trade or business, such as the practice of law, accounting, health, investment and similar businesses that rely on reputation. Thus, a specified practice, such as medicine, is arguably excluded were it not for the income threshold. Stated simply, the prohibition does not apply until income levels exceed $315,000 for married individuals filing jointly ($157,500 for other individuals) subject to a phase-in applicable percentage. Thus, the benefits of the deduction are indirectly extended to lower paid practitioners. Note engineering and architecture are denied indirect benefit regardless the level of income.

Perhaps the key provision is the limitation on the 20% deduction because most taxpayers understand the income generated from their business. The 20% deduction cannot exceed the greater of: (1) 50% of the W-2 wages from the QTB (“W-2 wage limitation”), or (2) the sum of 25% of the W-2 wages paid with respect to the QTB plus 2.5% of the unadjusted basis, immediately after acquisition, of all “qualified property.” Qualified property is defined in §199A(b)(6)) as tangible, depreciable property which is held by and available for use in the QTB by the close of the tax year, is used during the year and whose depreciation period has not ended. Perhaps the most notable provision is the later one, which allows the 20% deduction to qualify real estate operations.

Examples

There are two examples in the Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference that may be helpful to the reader.

Example 1 – Husband (H) and Wife (W) file a joint return and show $520,000 of taxable income and receive $10,000 in REIT dividends.   H’s share of QBI is $300,000 and his 20% is $60,000. H’s allocable share of wages paid by the business is $100,000 and 50% of that figure is $50,000.  Because the joint income is above $315,000, the phase-in of the wage limit applies so the $50,000 is reduced by $2,000 which is 20% of the difference between $60,000 and $50,000. Thus, H’s QBI is $58,000 ($60,000-$2,000).

W has a current QBI of $325,000 and W-2 wages of $150,000 from her sole proprietorship. Once again, because the joint income is above $315,000, the phase-in of the wage limit applies. 80% is applicable percentage that is applied to QBI of $325,000 and W-2 wages of $150,000, and the results are $260,000 and $120,000, respectively. In order to determine the deduction, W’s QBI of $260,000 is multiplied by 20% (limitation) and W-2 wages of $120,000 by the 50% (wage limitation) and the results are $52,000 and $60,000, respectively. W’s deductible is $52,000, the lesser of the two figures.

H and W combined QBI is $112,000 and is comprised of the deductible amount from each ($58,000 plus $52,000) plus 20% of REIT dividends ($2,000). Their deduction is limited to $104,000 which is the lesser of $112,000 or $104,000, which is 20% of taxable income of $520,000.

Example 2 – Husband (H) and Wife (W) file a joint return and show $200,000 of taxable income and a qualified business carryover loss of $50,000.   H is a sole proprietor of QTB and has income of $150,000 so his OBI is $30,000. Because the joint income is below $315,000, the wage limit does not apply. W has a current $40,000 loss so her qualified business loss is $8,000. Once again, the joint income is below $315,000 so the wage limit does not apply. H and W combined business income is $12,000 consisting of $30,000 from H less $8,000 from W less $10,000 from the carryover loss (20% of $50,000). The deduction is limited to $12,000 which is the lesser $40,000 (20% of $150,000) or $12,000.

It remains to be seen whether the section 199A will transform existing business structures to the extent that some predict although the choice of entity decision for new businesses has been made more opaque for the average person.

If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, James McDonough, at 201-806-3364.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable? post image

Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?"
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery post image

How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery"
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore post image

The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore"
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers post image

BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers"
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected? post image

IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?"
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next post image

Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!