
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: January 4, 2018

Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comNo provision in the new tax law has received more attention than the new section 199A. Section 199A defines a new term called “Qualified Business Income” (“QBI”) and further provides non-corporate taxpayers, including trusts and estates, will be entitled to receive a deduction for a percentage of QBI. The 20% deduction is not an itemized deduction from adjusted gross income, rather it is allowed as a deduction reducing taxable income.

QBI is the net amount of “qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss” received from any qualified trade or business of the taxpayer that is a partnership, S corporation or sole proprietorship to the extent that the items are effectively connected with a business within the United States (a “Qualified Trade or Business” or “QTB”). A non-corporate taxpayer receiving QBI is entitled to deduct:
Plus
The rub is that there are definitions within definitions and understanding the 20% deduction is navigable only if you have patience.
The “combined qualified business income amount” means the deductible amount for each qualified trade or business of the taxpayer (defined as 20% of the taxpayer’s QBI subject to the W-2 wage limitation discussed below; plus (ii) 20% of the aggregate amount of qualified real estate investment trust (REIT) dividends and qualified publicly traded partnership income of the taxpayer for the tax year. QBI does not include reasonable compensation paid to the taxpayer; any guaranteed payment to a partner for services to QTB under (Section 707(c)); or a payment by the QTB under (Section. 707(a)) to a partner for services to the QTB or any specified investment items. Thus, all income is not necessarily QBI.
A QTB is any trade or business except that of an employee or a specified trade or business, such as the practice of law, accounting, health, investment and similar businesses that rely on reputation. Thus, a specified practice, such as medicine, is arguably excluded were it not for the income threshold. Stated simply, the prohibition does not apply until income levels exceed $315,000 for married individuals filing jointly ($157,500 for other individuals) subject to a phase-in applicable percentage. Thus, the benefits of the deduction are indirectly extended to lower paid practitioners. Note engineering and architecture are denied indirect benefit regardless the level of income.
Perhaps the key provision is the limitation on the 20% deduction because most taxpayers understand the income generated from their business. The 20% deduction cannot exceed the greater of: (1) 50% of the W-2 wages from the QTB (“W-2 wage limitation”), or (2) the sum of 25% of the W-2 wages paid with respect to the QTB plus 2.5% of the unadjusted basis, immediately after acquisition, of all “qualified property.” Qualified property is defined in §199A(b)(6)) as tangible, depreciable property which is held by and available for use in the QTB by the close of the tax year, is used during the year and whose depreciation period has not ended. Perhaps the most notable provision is the later one, which allows the 20% deduction to qualify real estate operations.
There are two examples in the Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference that may be helpful to the reader.
Example 1 – Husband (H) and Wife (W) file a joint return and show $520,000 of taxable income and receive $10,000 in REIT dividends. H’s share of QBI is $300,000 and his 20% is $60,000. H’s allocable share of wages paid by the business is $100,000 and 50% of that figure is $50,000. Because the joint income is above $315,000, the phase-in of the wage limit applies so the $50,000 is reduced by $2,000 which is 20% of the difference between $60,000 and $50,000. Thus, H’s QBI is $58,000 ($60,000-$2,000).
W has a current QBI of $325,000 and W-2 wages of $150,000 from her sole proprietorship. Once again, because the joint income is above $315,000, the phase-in of the wage limit applies. 80% is applicable percentage that is applied to QBI of $325,000 and W-2 wages of $150,000, and the results are $260,000 and $120,000, respectively. In order to determine the deduction, W’s QBI of $260,000 is multiplied by 20% (limitation) and W-2 wages of $120,000 by the 50% (wage limitation) and the results are $52,000 and $60,000, respectively. W’s deductible is $52,000, the lesser of the two figures.
H and W combined QBI is $112,000 and is comprised of the deductible amount from each ($58,000 plus $52,000) plus 20% of REIT dividends ($2,000). Their deduction is limited to $104,000 which is the lesser of $112,000 or $104,000, which is 20% of taxable income of $520,000.
Example 2 – Husband (H) and Wife (W) file a joint return and show $200,000 of taxable income and a qualified business carryover loss of $50,000. H is a sole proprietor of QTB and has income of $150,000 so his OBI is $30,000. Because the joint income is below $315,000, the wage limit does not apply. W has a current $40,000 loss so her qualified business loss is $8,000. Once again, the joint income is below $315,000 so the wage limit does not apply. H and W combined business income is $12,000 consisting of $30,000 from H less $8,000 from W less $10,000 from the carryover loss (20% of $50,000). The deduction is limited to $12,000 which is the lesser $40,000 (20% of $150,000) or $12,000.
It remains to be seen whether the section 199A will transform existing business structures to the extent that some predict although the choice of entity decision for new businesses has been made more opaque for the average person.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, James McDonough, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!