
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: May 3, 2024
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comA resolution currently being debated in the New Jersey Legislature would allow voters to determine whether environmental rights should be enshrined in the State Constitution. Senate Resolution 43/Assembly Resolution 119 specifically asks voters to decide whether the New Jersey Constitution should be amended to make the State the trustee of public natural resources and guarantee citizens the right to a clean and healthy environment.
The so-called New Jersey Green Amendment was first proposed in 2017 but has previously failed to gain enough traction to come before voters. Earlier this year, Senator Linda Greenstein and Senator Andrew Zwicker re-advanced the amendment with the introduction of Senate Resolution 43.
As in the past, supporters of the amendment maintain that environmental rights need constitutional protection to ensure that government officials act to prevent environmental harm. “Our environment is our greatest asset,’’ said co-sponsor Sen. Linda Greenstein. “We all need clean air, clean water, and a clean environment to thrive.’’
Meanwhile, business groups argue that despite its laudable goals, the proposed amendment would spur environmental litigation and hamper the state’s economic growth. “It is going to impact every major development that we want, or do not want,’’ said Ray Cantor, deputy government affairs director for the New Jersey Business & Industry Association.
Senate Resolution 43/Assembly Resolution 119 proposes to place the question depicted below on the ballot in November:
“Do you approve of amending the Constitution to grant every person the right to a clean and healthy environment? The amendment would also require the State to protect its natural resources.” If the question is approved, the New Jersey Constitution would be amended to provide that:
“Every person has a right to a clean and healthy environment, including pure water, clean air, and ecologically healthy habitats, and to the preservation of the natural, scenic, historic, and esthetic qualities of the environment. The State shall not infringe upon these rights, by action or inaction. The State’s public natural resources, among them its waters, air, flora, fauna, climate, and public lands, are the common property of all the people, including both present and future generations. The State shall serve as trustee of these resources, and shall conserve and maintain them for the benefit of all people.” The wide breadth of this language may pose problematic to enforce and will likely result in significant litigation among New Jersey stakeholders.
Under Senate Resolution 43/Assembly Resolution 119, as amended, voters would be asked the following question: “Do you approve amending the Constitution to grant every person the right to a clean and healthy environment? The amendment would also require the State to protect its natural resources.”
Under Article IX, paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constitution, the Amendment must receive an affirmative vote from three-fifths of all members of each of the respective houses of the New Jersey legislature, or a majority of same during two consecutive legislative years, before it can be submitted to voters as a ballot question at the general election. If approved, the constitutional amendment would become part of the Constitution on March 1 of the year following the general election at which it is approved by the voters.
Whether New Jersey lawmakers and voters will approve the Green Amendment remains to be seen. Pennsylvania, New York, and Montana have amended their state constitutions to include similar environmental rights. Should it become law, the amendment is likely to spur significant legal challenges and could also make development in New Jersey more burdensome and expensive. The attorneys of Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Environmental Law Group will continue to monitor the status of the resolution and provide legal updates.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Since his inauguration two months ago, Donald Trump’s administration and the Congress it controls have indicated important upcoming policy changes. These changes will impact financial services policies and priorities. The changes will particularly affect cryptocurrency, as well as banking rules and regulations. Key Regulatory Changes in Cryptocurrency For example, in the burgeoning cryptocurrency business environment, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
The retail sector has experienced a wave of bankruptcy filings over the last year. Brick-and-mortar businesses in financial distress include big-name brands like Big Lots, Party City, The Container Store, and Vitamin Shoppe. When large retailers seek bankruptcy protection, they are not the only businesses impacted. Landlords can be particularly hard hit. While commercial landlords […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
The bankruptcy legal landscape presents both challenges and opportunities for businesses navigating financial distress. Understanding current bankruptcy trends can help businesses make more informed and strategic decisions. Corporate Bankruptcy Filings Trending Upwards Bankruptcy filings continued to trend upwards in 2024. According to statistics released by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, personal and business […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
In December, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced charges against two privately held companies for failing to file a Form D notice, which is generally utilized for exempt securities offerings. Here, the SEC’s enforcement sends a strong message: compliance with regulatory requirements is not optional and failure to comply can have significant consequences. […]
Author: Kenneth C. Oh
On February 14, 2025, the Office of General Counsel (OGC) of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) under Acting General Counsel William B. Cowen issued Memorandum 25-05, “New Process for More Efficient, Effective, Accessible and Transparent Case handling.” The Memorandum rescinds nearly all of the Memoranda issued by his direct predecessor, Jennifer Abruzzo, setting the […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
If you purchase real property from a foreign person or entity, you may be required to withhold taxes from your payment to the seller under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA). The federal tax law is designed to ensure that foreign sellers pay any applicable capital gains tax on profits realized from […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!