Everyone from former U.S. Senator Fred Thompson to actor Robert Wagner is currently pitching reverse mortgages on television. From the advertisements, these financial transactions appear to be a lifesaver for cash-strapped retirees. However, homeowners should understand that reverse mortgages also carry significant risks.
In basic terms, a reverse mortgage is a special type of loan that allows homeowners to convert a portion of the equity in their home into cash. To apply, homeowners must generally own their home outright or owe little money on an existing mortgage, as well as meet certain age restrictions. Borrowers can elect to receive periodic payments or a lump sum disbursement. They must still pay annual taxes, property insurance, and maintenance or risk default on the mortgage. Most reverse mortgages are non-recourse loans, which means that the lender has cannot pursue any of the borrower’s other assets in the event of default.
Reverse mortgages do not have to be repaid until the home is sold, no longer used as a principal residence, or the borrower defaults on the obligations of the mortgage. At that time, the borrowers must repay all payments, interest, and finance charges. If the borrower dies, the loan must also be repaid, and any remaining equity in the property then passes to the heirs. Any mortgage debt, however, is not transferrable.
While reverse mortgages sound good in theory, they do not always work out as anticipated. In fact, approximately 1 in 10 were in default at the end of 2012.
In addition, many spouses who removed their names from deeds and did not sign mortgage documents in order to meet reverse mortgage age requirements have found themselves facing foreclosure upon the death of their spouses. Lenders claim that the death of the borrower triggers repayment obligations, while the surviving spouses maintain that brokers promised them that they would not be displaced.
The disputes are currently the subject of several lawsuits alleging that lenders failed to comply with the terms of mortgage agreements. The Department of Housing and Urban Development, which insures reverse mortgages, is also facing a suit alleging that agency policies failed to comply with a federal law that specifies that surviving spouses are considered homeowners even if they are not listed on reverse mortgage documents.
The bottom-line is that homeowners should fully consider all of their options before deciding to pursue a reverse mortgage. Like all financial transactions, it carries both risks and rewards.
If you have any questions about reverse mortgages or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Victor Kinon, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
Why Compliance Monitoring Matters for NY and NJ Businesses
Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
When Are New Jersey Business Owners Personally Liable for Corporate Debt?
New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Commercial real estate trends in 2026 are being shaped by shifting economic conditions, technological innovation, and evolving tenant demands. As the market adjusts to changing interest rates, capital flows, and workplace models, investors, owners, tenants, and developers must understand how these trends are influencing opportunities and risk in the year ahead. Overall Outlook for Commercial […]
One Big Beautiful Bill: New Tip Income Tax Rules Employers & Workers Need to Know
Part 2 – Tips Excluded from Income Certain employees and independent contractors may be eligible to deduct tips from their income for tax years 2025 through 2028 under provisions included in the One Big Beautiful Bill. The deduction is capped at $25,000 per year and begins to phase out at $150,000 of modified adjusted gross […]
One Big Beautiful Bill: New Overtime Tax Rules Employers and Employees Need to Know
Part 1 – Overtime Pay and Income Tax Treatment Overview This Firm Insights post summarizes one provision of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” related to the tax treatment of overtime compensation and related employer wage reporting obligations. Overtime Pay and Employee Tax Treatment The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) generally requires that overtime be paid […]
New York’s FAIR Business Practices Act: What the New Consumer Protection Measure Means for Your Business
In 2025, New York enacted one of the most consequential updates to its consumer protection framework in decades. The Fostering Affordability and Integrity through Reasonable Business Practices Act (FAIR Act) significantly expands the scope and strength of New York’s long-standing consumer protection statute, General Business Law § 349, and alters the compliance landscape for New York […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
