
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: September 30, 2015
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comBoomerang Systems Inc., a New Jersey-based leading provider of automated robotic parking solutions, recently filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. The company, known for creating high-tech parking decks where robots store and retrieve the vehicles, plans to secure new financing.
Boomerang and three affiliated debtors cited in bankruptcy filings that the company is seeking to restructure its balance sheet due to insufficient operating capital. According to Bankruptcy Company News, the company claimed that it had failed to turn a profit from its automated parking systems since its launch in 2007. As a result, the company had funded operations with debt with the goal of emerging as a viable business when it built a market for its automated parking systems products.
Boomerang’s objective is to develop a restructuring plan that will enable the company to continue operations, according to NJ Biz. Company officials also explained that a group of its senior secured debt holders have committed to finance the restructuring. To facilitate its restructuring, Boomerang filed a motion with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to approve debtor-in-possession financing. In turn, the company has obtained $2.5 million in post-petition financing from Game Over Technology Investors, LLC pending confirmation of a chapter 11 restructuring plan. The debtor-in-possession financing facility is on a super-priority basis in an aggregate principal amount of $2.5 million, of which it seeks to use up to $1,000,000 as cash collateral on an interim basis in conjunction with the debtor-in-possession order. According to bankruptcy filings, the remaining amount will be available on a monthly basis, subject to certain milestones and continued compliance with the funding conditions. The debtor-in-possession financing will provide Boomerang with the necessary liquidity to finance operations throughout the bankruptcy period.
The company and its three affiliates are seeking approval from the court to support its working capital requirements and general corporate purposes. Company officials also explained in court documents that there is uncertainty over the Boomerang’s future, as more employee layoffs are expected.
Boomerang stated that it has retained Togut, Segal & Segal LLP and Ciardi, Ciardi & Astin to represent Boomerang and its three affiliates throughout the bankruptcy period. However, the company also retained Berg & Androphy to represent it against its defaulting lender.
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
Business partnerships, much like marriages, function exceptionally well when partners are aligned but can become challenging when disagreements arise. Partnership disputes often stem from conflicts over business strategy, financial management, and unclear role definitions among partners. Understanding Business Partnership Conflicts Partnership conflicts place significant stress on businesses, making proactive measures essential. Partnerships should establish detailed […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!