Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 15, 2017
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comNew York City recently became the latest to prohibit employers from asking job applicants for their salary history during the job interview or salary negotiation process.
Last year, Massachusetts became the first state in the country to ban employers and recruiters from asking job candidates about their wage history. Other states and municipalities have quickly followed suit. Last month, the New York City Council passed a regulation making it an unlawful discriminatory employment practice to inquire about the salary history of a job applicant, or rely on an applicant’s salary history when setting compensation during the hiring process.
New York State is currently considering similar legislation. Assembly Bill 5982 would make it an unlawful discriminatory practice for any employer, labor organization, employment agency or licensing agency to seek salary history from a prospective employee for an interview or as a condition of employment. The bill is currently in committee.
A New Jersey bill would amend the Law Against Discrimination (LAD) to include similar prohibitions. Under Assembly Bill No. 3480, employers would be prohibited from inquiring about the salary history of a job applicant, including the prospective candidate’s compensation and benefits.
On the federal level, lawmakers recently reintroduced the Paycheck Fairness Act. It would prohibit employers from screening job applicants based on their salary history or requiring salary history during the interview and hiring process. It would also require employers to prove that pay disparities exist for legitimate, job-related reasons and protect against retaliation for discussing salaries with colleagues.
The rationale behind the bans is that an unfair wage can continue to haunt workers when it is used to set the salary for a new position. In practice, women and minorities are often impacted most by pay discrimination. Accordingly, the restriction on asking about salary history is intended to improve pay equality by forcing employers to determine compensation based solely on merit.
Critics of wage history bans contend that the laws don’t actually help close the gender pay gap, but are merely window dressing that will more pointedly make hiring harder. They further maintain that companies are already taking steps to address pay equality and that additional wage laws only create regulatory burdens.
The Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce recently filed a lawsuit challenging the city’s salary history ban. It argues that the law violates employers’ First Amendment rights. “The ordinance is a broad impediment to businesses seeking to grow their workforce in the city of Philadelphia,” the chamber said in a statement.
For businesses that operate in several jurisdictions, it is important to stay on top of legal developments in this area. According to the National Women’s Law Center, 20 states, the District of Columbia, and two cities have introduced legislation that seeks to restrict inquiries into salary history information.
If your company is already subject to wage inquiry regulations, it is imperative to verify that all human resources personnel and hiring managers understand the new restrictions. Employers should also verify that any job applications do not request applicants to provide their salary history.
Do you have any questions regarding the salary history ban and how it may affect your New York business? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Sean Dias, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!