Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe Securities and Exchange Commission has cleared Apple Inc. of any potential tax law violations after months of examining the company’s complex and sometimes controversial financial and tax practices.

According to Forbes, the SEC has given Apple the green ligh to continue utilizing its existing tax strategies and even wrote a letter to affirm that the company’s financial and tax maneuvering fall in line with generally accepted accounting practices. This includes the use of the so-called “Double Irish and the Dutch Sandwich,” which has made headlines recently as a controversial tax strategy.
Under this method – which has been used by behemoths such as Google, Facebook, and Hewlett Packard – companies set up Irish and Dutch subsidiary companies in low- or no-tax jurisdictions. They can then funnel profits through the first Irish subsidiary to the Dutch company, and then back to a second Irish subsidiary which sends the profits to a tax haven. Google was able to funnel roughly $12 million in royalty payments to Bermuda last year – 25 percent more than in 2011 – and reduce its overseas tax rate to about five percent. Now that Apple has been cleared for similar methods, it’s speculated that more corporations may follow suit.
For instance, Twitter is expected to adopt this tax practice in the future, as it has recently set up an international company “Twitter International Company” in Ireland, according to Daily Gadgetry. Rather than paying the 35 percent corporate tax rate if the company funneled profits back to the U.S., Twitter could end up paying a significantly lower rate in Ireland. However, it would still be subject to the 35 percent rate if it decided to repatriate profits to the U.S.
Although more tax law cases are emerging that call corporate strategies into question, new legislation prohibiting long-established practices has yet to be introduced.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!