Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 1, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comIn 2012, Planetary Resources, Inc. announced that it planned to mine near-Earth asteroids for precious metals such as iron and platinum. The company attracted several high-profile funders, including Google Inc.’s Larry Page and director James Cameron. Several other companies have announced similar initiatives.
Although commercial space resource exploration is still in its infancy (no one has actually landed a manned spacecraft on an asteroid), lawmakers on Capitol Hill are currently considering legislation that would protect the property rights of U.S. companies that mine asteroid resources in outer space. The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed the Space Resource Exploration and Utilization Act of 2015 (H.R.1508), which is part of the larger SPACE Act (H.R. 2262).
“Asteroids are excellent potential sources of highly valuable resources and minerals. Space technology has advanced to the point that the private sector is now able to begin exploring and developing resources in space. Americans are willing to invest in asteroid mining, but they need legal certainty that they can keep the fruits of their labor.”
Under the proposed bill, resources mined from an asteroid would be the property of the entity that obtained them. The legislation specifically states that “[a]ny asteroid resources obtained in outer space are the property of the entity that obtained such resources, which shall be entitled to all property rights thereto, consistent with applicable provisions of Federal law and existing international obligations.”
The proposed space law also contains provisions intended to ensure that U.S. companies can legally conduct their operations without harmful interference.
Under the legislation, U.S. commercial space resource companies or foreign companies that voluntarily submit to the law statutory framework must “avoid causing harmful interference in outer space.” The Space Resource Exploration and Utilization Act of 2015 also authorizes operators to bring civil suits against “another entity subject to United States jurisdiction causing harmful interference to its operations with respect to an asteroid resource utilization activity in outer space.”
In addition, the legislation directs the White House to facilitate commercial development of asteroid resources. It mandates that the President “promote the right of United States commercial entities to explore outer space and utilize space resources, in accordance with the existing international obligations of the United States, free from harmful interference, and to transfer or sell such resources.”
As noted by the Wall Street Journal, the proposed commercial space exploration legislation is groundbreaking and controversial, with some critics questioning whether such unilateral action is even legal under existing space law treaties. Pursuant to the Outer Space Treaty of 1967, “[t]he exploration and use of outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, shall be carried out for the benefit and in the interests of all countries, irrespective of their degree of economic or scientific development, and shall be the province of all mankind.” The treaty further states that “[o]uter space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means.”
Accordingly, companion legislation introduced in the U.S. Senate by Sens. Patty Murray and Marco Rubio will likely generate additional study and debate. Stay tuned for updates.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich

Commercial real estate trends in 2026 are being shaped by shifting economic conditions, technological innovation, and evolving tenant demands. As the market adjusts to changing interest rates, capital flows, and workplace models, investors, owners, tenants, and developers must understand how these trends are influencing opportunities and risk in the year ahead. Overall Outlook for Commercial […]
Author: Michael J. Willner

Part 2 – Tips Excluded from Income Certain employees and independent contractors may be eligible to deduct tips from their income for tax years 2025 through 2028 under provisions included in the One Big Beautiful Bill. The deduction is capped at $25,000 per year and begins to phase out at $150,000 of modified adjusted gross […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

Part 1 – Overtime Pay and Income Tax Treatment Overview This Firm Insights post summarizes one provision of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” related to the tax treatment of overtime compensation and related employer wage reporting obligations. Overtime Pay and Employee Tax Treatment The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) generally requires that overtime be paid […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

In 2025, New York enacted one of the most consequential updates to its consumer protection framework in decades. The Fostering Affordability and Integrity through Reasonable Business Practices Act (FAIR Act) significantly expands the scope and strength of New York’s long-standing consumer protection statute, General Business Law § 349, and alters the compliance landscape for New York […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!