Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Spouses Should Be Aware of 'Gift-Splitting' Criteria when Gifting Assets
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: August 26, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Lawmakers’ decision to both set the estate tax at $5.25 million for 2013 and increase the annual gift tax to $14,000 has been a welcomed sigh of relief for many affluent individuals and business owners. The gift tax, in particular, has historically been a key strategy Americans have used to transfer wealth to future generations and lower their taxable estate or tax liability.
Couples who file jointly have the added advantage of doubling the amount they can gift to individuals at a tax-free rate, enabling them to extend $28,000 in cash or assets to loved ones. However, when one spouse chooses to extend a gift to another person, a scenario known as “gift-splitting” should be discussed to help them avoid federal gift taxes. Gift-splitting works as follows: If an individual or their spouse makes a gift to someone else, that gift can be considered for tax purposes as having been made half by the gifter and half by his or her spouse.
However, the IRS dictates that both individuals must agree to split the gift. This means that either spouse or the couple together could make a gift of up to $28,000 to any person and not be subject to the gift tax, so long as they both agree to it. If they do, they can each can take the annual exclusion for their part of the gift. However, the tax agency also notes that if they split the gift they made, they must file a gift-tax return to show that the individual and their spouse agrees to use gift splitting. The filing requirement is the case even if half of the split gift is less than the annual exclusion.
When gifting large amounts to children or other beneficiaries and utilizing the gift-splitting rule, it may be helpful for spouses to speak with a tax professional to understand their obligations.
- Practices: Tax and Trusts & Estates, Sophisticated Estate Planning & Wealth Preservation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.