
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.com
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comTax professionals frequently encounter non-qualified deferred compensation plans (“NQDCA”) in the context of an estate or business. NQDCA’s include any arrangement where an employee or a service provider (independent contractor) receives a legally binding right to receive compensation in one year but it is not actually received until a later year. A legally binding right includes those situations where the service provider has the right to receive income if conditions are met. The inherent problem is that many plans in place have not been reviewed for compliance and have not been modified to satisfy these rules. The consequences of an IRC §409A violation are severe and include a back income tax, interest from the original date of deferral, and a penalty equal to 20% of the deferred compensation.
§409A was enacted in 2004 and regulations, consisting of nearly 400 pages, were issued in 2007. §409A also applies to a NQDCA between a partnership and its employees. Partnership equity awards are covered by a separate set of rules, at least for now.
§409A does not trigger recognition of income if the NQDCA satisfies certain requirements. First, deferrals in advance of having the right to the income must be made by the service provider (employee, independent contractor). Second, there must be a definite payment schedule which may include payments to be made after death or upon disability of the service provider, on a change of control or unforeseen emergency. Third, employees of publically traded employers must wait six months before receiving payment. Fourth, a service provider may alter a payment schedule by accelerating or deferring payments for Qualified Domestic Relations Order, but not beyond five (5) years.
An individual relying on NQDCA payments for retirement income would do well to ensure compliance. An individual owning an interest in a business would be well advised to become compliant to protect the value of the enterprise. Finally, clients who contemplate selling their businesses would do well to address the issue before due diligence begins and the sales price of the business is diminished by the potential liability.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!