Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
U.S. Supreme Court Gives Green Light to Gray Market Goods
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: April 10, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued its decision in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The closely watched copyright infringement case considered how the first sale doctrine applies to so-called “gray market” goods that are purchased legally overseas and re-sold in the United States.
The conflict involved two potentially contradictory copyright laws. Under the first sale doctrine, the owner of a lawfully made work is entitled to resell the work without the authorization of the copyright owner. Meanwhile, the Copyright Act prohibits the importation of copyrighted goods without the authority of the copyright owner.
In a 6-3 decision, the majority concluded that first-sale doctrine applies regardless of where the goods are manufactured. Thus, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals erred in concluding that an individual who purchased and imported foreign-made editions of U.S. textbooks into the United States and then sold them on eBay could not avail himself of the first sale doctrine.
The court’s decision relied on the statutory language, legislative history and common-law interpretations of the first sale doctrine. Taken together, the justices concluded that they all favor a non-geographical interpretation.
As explained by the Court, an alternative interpretation of the first sale doctrine not only “bristles with linguistic difficulties,” but would also fail to further basic constitutional copyright objectives. The opinion further noted the practical implications, stating that “reliance on the ‘first sale” doctrine is also deeply embedded in the practices of booksellers, libraries, museums, and retailers, who have long relied on its protection.”
For businesses that rely on the grey market, the decision is clearly good news. For copyright holders who sell products like books and DVDs internationally, it is time to consider alternative methods of limiting distribution, such as contracts.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Jay Surgent, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
- Practices: Copyright
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
U.S. Supreme Court Gives Green Light to Gray Market Goods
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued its decision in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The closely watched copyright infringement case considered how the first sale doctrine applies to so-called “gray market” goods that are purchased legally overseas and re-sold in the United States.
The conflict involved two potentially contradictory copyright laws. Under the first sale doctrine, the owner of a lawfully made work is entitled to resell the work without the authorization of the copyright owner. Meanwhile, the Copyright Act prohibits the importation of copyrighted goods without the authority of the copyright owner.
In a 6-3 decision, the majority concluded that first-sale doctrine applies regardless of where the goods are manufactured. Thus, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals erred in concluding that an individual who purchased and imported foreign-made editions of U.S. textbooks into the United States and then sold them on eBay could not avail himself of the first sale doctrine.
The court’s decision relied on the statutory language, legislative history and common-law interpretations of the first sale doctrine. Taken together, the justices concluded that they all favor a non-geographical interpretation.
As explained by the Court, an alternative interpretation of the first sale doctrine not only “bristles with linguistic difficulties,” but would also fail to further basic constitutional copyright objectives. The opinion further noted the practical implications, stating that “reliance on the ‘first sale” doctrine is also deeply embedded in the practices of booksellers, libraries, museums, and retailers, who have long relied on its protection.”
For businesses that rely on the grey market, the decision is clearly good news. For copyright holders who sell products like books and DVDs internationally, it is time to consider alternative methods of limiting distribution, such as contracts.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Jay Surgent, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.