
Donald M. Pepe
Partner
732-568-8370 dpepe@sh-law.com
Partner
732-568-8370 dpepe@sh-law.com
As property owners, developers, contractors, construction managers, subcontractors, design professionals, engineers, and lenders can attest, the legal issues that can arise in the construction industry are unique and complex. The stakes are also extremely high, which makes it imperative to have a solid understanding of construction law and how it impacts your legal interests.
Construction projects are generally subject to a myriad of federal, state, and local laws. For instance, a project may be subject to federal regulations involving the workplace and environmental safety, state laws governing licensing and building codes, and local ordinances establishing zoning and permitting requirements. Further complicating matters, the legal standards often differ for commercial, industrial, and residential projects.
Construction law is also unique in that it encompasses several distinct areas of law and often overlapping areas of responsibility. Below are some examples:
While it may seem overwhelming, understanding construction law has numerous benefits, including ensuring enforceable contracts, maintaining regulatory compliance, protecting your company’s legal rights, and reducing the risk of legal disputes.
The legal complexities of the construction industry often result in disputes. Lawsuits often arise around issues such as breach of contract through late or non-payment for work and services, late or non-complete work, material selections, and design and workmanship defects.
Because lawsuits can be costly and time-consuming, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is often preferred over traditional construction litigation. As discussed in greater detail here, mediation relies on a neutral third party to help negotiate the differences in the parties’ positions in order to lead to the settlement of all or some of the issues in dispute. Unlike a judge or jury, the role of the mediator is to help the parties settle rather than make any binding decision regarding the dispute.
Arbitration is similar in that a neutral third party is appointed to resolve the dispute; the key distinction is that an arbitrator renders a decision, which is generally final. The process is much more formal than mediation but still offers many advantages over litigation, including a significantly faster and less costly resolution. In both forms of ADR, the parties can select a mediator or arbitrator who specializes in construction industry claims and, therefore, may be more knowledgeable than a judge or jury. Another key advantage of ADR is the ability to privately resolve disputes out of the public eye.
Litigation is sometimes unavoidable. Some legal remedies, such as mechanic liens, must be pursued in strict accordance with applicable statutory provisions. In some cases, it can also be advantageous to file a lawsuit because any court decision, whether rendered by a judge or jury, is eligible for appellate review. Since every legal dispute involves different legal and factual issues, it is advisable to consult with an experienced construction litigation attorney who can help determine the best dispute resolution mechanism.
Construction projects involve a complex web of regulations and contracts involving numerous entities, many of whom have diverging financial and legal interests. It is imperative to legally protect your business and your projects.
Scarinci Hollenbeck’s construction lawyer team has extensive industry experience, particularly in New Jersey and metropolitan New York City. Our construction law attorneys also have the benefit of relying on their colleagues in related practice areas, such as Commercial Real Estate, Financing, Environmental, and Land Use, which gives our clients a tremendous advantage. By leveraging years of legal experience in every discipline related to construction law, our team can provide strategic legal guidance through every phase of a construction project.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!