Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

What Findings Are Required for FINRA Expungement?

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: December 13, 2022

Key Contacts

Back

Under FINRA Rule 2080, broker-dealer firms, offices, and professionals in the securities industry can request customer disputes be expunged from FINRA’s public records. When reputation is so important to client trust and retention, expungement is a no-brainer. But FINRA has high standards of review and a limited appeals process to challenge decisions – you must make sure to take the right steps when approaching this process. This is especially true if you’re currently in the middle of an unresolved arbitration. Otherwise, your request for expungement could be denied, leaving the dispute on your firm’s record. So, what findings are required for FINRA expungement?

The SEC recently proposed new rule changes to the expungement process. An experienced securities lawyer can help you navigate this ever-changing arena of regulations.

FINRA Expungement Requirements

FINRA’s expungement process is meant to balance three separate industry interests:

  • Regulators who need relevant and correct information to fulfill their duties,
  • Brokerages who need a fair process to defend their professional reputations, and
  • Investors who need substantive and accurate information to make decisions.

As a result, the agency considers expungement an extraordinary remedy to be allowed only if the expunged records hold no significant value for regulators or investors.

FINRA Rule 12805 details the process for filing a successful request for expungement of customer dispute information. This includes a recorded hearing session, a review of relevant settlement documents, and regulatory grounds for why expungement should be granted.

There are four reasons expungement may be granted under FINRA Rule 2080:

  • The information in the claim is factually impossible or clearly erroneous,
  • You weren’t actually involved in the alleged misconduct or violation,
  • The allegation, claim, or information in the dispute is false, or
  • You were awarded expungement in another judicial or arbitration proceeding and the expungement would not have an adverse effect on industry interests.

FINRA sets out different procedures for handling expungement based on whether the expungement orders are granted through an arbitration panel, an outside court, or a settlement reached either in or outside the arbitration process. For example:

  • Outside-court expungement directives must be issued in compliance with Rule 12805, which requires an affirmative finding for expungement under Rule 2080.
  • FINRA may expunge records based on defamation even without a court order.
  • If you settle in arbitration, you can jointly request an affirmative finding for expungement from the arbitration panel.
  • If you settle outside the arbitration process, you will likely have to obtain a court order confirming any settlement award for expungement.
  • If you reach a settlement after arbiters have issued a decision on the merits, both parties may jointly request that arbiters reopen the case to make substantive changes to the arbitration award. However, this comes with a short time limit.

An experienced FINRA litigation attorney will know how to properly handle these matters and set you up for the best possible chance at a successful resolution.

How to Present the Best Case for FINRA Expungement

When filing an expungement request, you must keep FINRA’s industry interests in mind. Regulators are concerned with having accurate and relevant information on record. A good securities lawyer should be able to anticipate, address, and disarm any concerns that regulators may have about the possibility of your expungement threatening any of these interests.

What findings are required for FINRA expungement? FINRA expungement rules are strict and the process is thorough. Between 2015 and 2020, the agency only expunged 4% of all customer disputes entered into the Central Registration Depository (CRD). You want to do everything you can to fall into that 4%. Because expungement is granted in only a narrow band of cases, you must be able to present convincing evidence that shows you qualify for this type of relief. At Scarinci Hollenbeck, we can help. Click here to contact us now and discuss your options for FINRA expungement.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable? post image

Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?"
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery post image

How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery"
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore post image

The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore"
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers post image

BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers"
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected? post image

IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?"
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next post image

Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!