Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 23, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comMany corporations are implementing strategies to reduce their liabilities under U.S. tax law, but as these practices come under more scrutiny from the Internal Revenue Service, some analysts are questioning whether they will remain viable in the future.
For instance, the Financial Times recently highlighted a practice implemented by Google, which allowed it to funnel roughly $11.91 billion in royalty payments to a shell corporation in Bermuda in 2012, a 25 percent increase from the amount transferred in 2011. The strategy – commonly called the Dutch Sandwich – involves a company selling or licensing its foreign rights to intellectual property developed in the United States to a subsidiary in a country with lower tax rates, Bloomberg explained. In doing so, foreign profits are then attributed to that offshore subsidiary rather than the U.S., greatly reducing the company’s tax liabilities.
In the case of Google, the company lowers its overseas tax rate to roughly 5 percent, less than half the rate in already low-tax Ireland. However, the move has also sparked controversy over the practice, namely because Google earns most of its foreign income in Ireland and does not pay substantial taxes in other countries. In addition to this set-up, the company moves most of its profits from Ireland to Bermuda, choosing to route the funds through the Netherlands to avoid withholding taxes, the Times added.
It is unclear how many U.S. companies have adopted this strategy, but a number of large corporations, including Facebook, Microsoft, and Starbucks have all come under fire for their controversial tax strategies. However, many analysts argue that while they may be complex, they are currently legal under U.S. tax law. This assertion may come under dispute by the IRS, however, which has said it will take a more detailed look into corporate tax strategies.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!