Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 1, 2023
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comWire fraud is a serious offense with long-lasting consequences for businesses and individuals. Understanding the legal ramifications of wire fraud is crucial for anyone suspected of committing the crime. This article will discuss wire fraud and the applicable statute of limitations.
A statute of limitations is a law that establishes the maximum amount of time that a party has to initiate legal proceedings from the date of an alleged civil or criminal offense.
Wire fraud is the dishonest use of electronic transmission to defraud a victim. This includes via the telephone, internet, or radio. Often, wire fraud involves the use of wire communications for the purpose of convincing a person to send money under pretenses.
Wire fraud charges have become increasingly prevalent as more people rely on the internet to find investment opportunities or market financial products. A wire fraud charge usually includes accusations of deliberate deception with the intent of unlawful gain that occurs via some form of telecommunication.
The statute of limitations for wire fraud varies based on the involvement of a financial institution. Usually, the statute of limitations for wire fraud is five years. In financial institution fraud cases, the statute of limitations is extended to 10 years.
Typical wire fraud-related cons to watch out for include:
The penalties for wire fraud depend on the nature of the offense. Individuals who commit wire fraud face a maximum of twenty years in prison and a $250,000 fine. The maximum penalties in cases involving financial institutions are 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine.
The prosecution needs to prove that the defendant intended to defraud someone of property or money. Essential elements of the case include the defendant’s participation in a fraud scheme and sending false information to the victim through the wires either in interstate commerce or internationally.
Even if the defendant insists that they did not know the wire communication’s fraudulent use, prosecutors may still have a case if they can prove that the defendant sent a wire transmission that it was reasonable to assume was for fraudulent use.
Lack of intent or authority is a possible defense strategy for a wire fraud charge. If a defendant has evidence to support their claim that they did not intend to defraud anyone, they may be able to avoid a conviction.
In some instances, a defense strategy may consist of a lack of authority. For example, if employees send supervisor-requested emails containing fraudulent content without realizing it, they should have a strong defense.
Wire fraud is a serious federal offense; you could face significant penalties if convicted. If you have been charged with committing wire fraud, you need to retain an attorney as soon as possible. The SH-Law team has an in-depth understanding of wire fraud charges. Our combined legal proficiency, sharp and imaginative insight, and unrelenting efforts produce results that consistently surpass our client’s expectations. Get in touch with us today for more information.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Wire fraud is a serious offense with long-lasting consequences for businesses and individuals. Understanding the legal ramifications of wire fraud is crucial for anyone suspected of committing the crime. This article will discuss wire fraud and the applicable statute of limitations.
A statute of limitations is a law that establishes the maximum amount of time that a party has to initiate legal proceedings from the date of an alleged civil or criminal offense.
Wire fraud is the dishonest use of electronic transmission to defraud a victim. This includes via the telephone, internet, or radio. Often, wire fraud involves the use of wire communications for the purpose of convincing a person to send money under pretenses.
Wire fraud charges have become increasingly prevalent as more people rely on the internet to find investment opportunities or market financial products. A wire fraud charge usually includes accusations of deliberate deception with the intent of unlawful gain that occurs via some form of telecommunication.
The statute of limitations for wire fraud varies based on the involvement of a financial institution. Usually, the statute of limitations for wire fraud is five years. In financial institution fraud cases, the statute of limitations is extended to 10 years.
Typical wire fraud-related cons to watch out for include:
The penalties for wire fraud depend on the nature of the offense. Individuals who commit wire fraud face a maximum of twenty years in prison and a $250,000 fine. The maximum penalties in cases involving financial institutions are 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine.
The prosecution needs to prove that the defendant intended to defraud someone of property or money. Essential elements of the case include the defendant’s participation in a fraud scheme and sending false information to the victim through the wires either in interstate commerce or internationally.
Even if the defendant insists that they did not know the wire communication’s fraudulent use, prosecutors may still have a case if they can prove that the defendant sent a wire transmission that it was reasonable to assume was for fraudulent use.
Lack of intent or authority is a possible defense strategy for a wire fraud charge. If a defendant has evidence to support their claim that they did not intend to defraud anyone, they may be able to avoid a conviction.
In some instances, a defense strategy may consist of a lack of authority. For example, if employees send supervisor-requested emails containing fraudulent content without realizing it, they should have a strong defense.
Wire fraud is a serious federal offense; you could face significant penalties if convicted. If you have been charged with committing wire fraud, you need to retain an attorney as soon as possible. The SH-Law team has an in-depth understanding of wire fraud charges. Our combined legal proficiency, sharp and imaginative insight, and unrelenting efforts produce results that consistently surpass our client’s expectations. Get in touch with us today for more information.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!