
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comClient Alert
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: March 13, 2026

Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.com
New Jersey is entering a decisive phase in its regulation of hemp-derived cannabinoid products, and operators across the supply chain now face a compressed timeline to align their businesses with the state’s new statutory framework. P.L.2025, c.215, enacted through Senate Bill S4509, introduces a comprehensive restructuring of how hemp products and intoxicating hemp beverages are defined, tested, sold, and monitored.
These changes represent a fundamental shift in what the State of New Jersey considers lawful hemp product commerce and significantly narrow the categories of products and types of retailers permitted to remain in the marketplace. With the first major deadline on April 13, 2026, operators must quickly evaluate their current inventories, product formulations, licensing pathways, and compliance systems to ensure continued operation under the updated definitions and regulatory expectations.
On April 13, a product will no longer qualify as hemp-based and instead will be regulated as cannabis and fall under the authority of the New Jersey Cannabis Regulatory Commission (CRC) if it:
April 13 also activates several operational requirements. A $3.75‑dollar per gallon excise fee applies to wholesale intoxicating hemp beverages (IHBs), and potency caps become mandatory. IHBs must not exceed 5 milligrams of THC per serving or 10 milligrams per container and must include a certificate of analysis (COA). In addition, beginning on April 13, IHBs may only be sold by operators holding plenary wholesale licenses or plenary retail distribution licenses from the New Jersey Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC), or by Class 5 Cannabis Retailers licensed by the New Jersey Cannabis Regulatory Commission.
On November 13, 2026, any IHB containing more than 0.4 milligrams total THC per container will be treated as cannabis and may only be sold through CRC‑licensed cannabis retailers. Penalties for noncompliance include civil monetary fines determined and imposed by the CRC for each violation, and the CRC may escalate enforcement through administrative orders, license suspensions or revocations, and product seizures. CRC may also refer noncompliance matters to another enforcement body, such as the Attorney General, local police, ABC, or another state agency, if the violation involves criminal conduct or falls under another agency’s jurisdiction.
In order to meet the impending April 13 deadline, operators must act now to:
1. Conduct a SKU‑level compliance audit. Verify each product meets statutory limits: ≤0.3% total THC (including THCA) dry‑weight, ≤0.4 mg total THC per container, and contains no synthesized or non‑natural cannabinoids. Remove non‑compliant items before April 13.
2. Adjust formulations. Reformulate products to stay below total‑THC thresholds and ensure intoxicating hemp beverages meet the 5 mg/serving and 10 mg/container caps.
3. Update labeling, testing, and COAs. Ensure the COAs list total THC, including THCA, and labels accurately reflect potency.
4. Prepare for excise tax implementation. Update financial systems to apply the $3.75‑per‑gallon wholesale excise tax on intoxicating hemp beverages.
5. Plan for inventory disposition. Identify and remove products exceeding 0.3 percent total THC or more than 0.4 milligrams total THC per container before April 13.
6. Confirm licensing for IHB sales. Only ABC plenary wholesale/retail distribution licensees and CRC‑licensed Class 5 retailers may sell intoxicating hemp beverages beginning April 13.
7. Update internal policies and staff training. Revise compliance procedures to reflect THC limits, COA requirements, and age restrictions prohibiting THC‑containing product sales to individuals under 21.
8. Coordinate with labs and suppliers. Ensure laboratories measure total THC in accordance with statutory definitions, and that suppliers provide compliant COAs and cannabinoid‑source attestations.
Our firm is assisting clients with every aspect of compliance under P.L.2025, c.215, and advising clients regarding related CRC licensing pathways. Please contact our Cannabis and Hemp Regulatory Group to ensure your organization meets all approaching deadlines.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Congress has taken a significant step toward delaying the sweeping federal restrictions on intoxicating hemp products scheduled to take effect this November. On August 8, 2026, the U.S. Senate approved a short-term federal funding measure that includes a hemp ban delay, postponing the implementation of most new federal hemp restrictions for approximately one month, from […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

Disputes surrounding New Jersey data centers are intensifying as the State positions itself as a leader in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and advanced technology infrastructure. Recent proceedings in Vineland and ongoing litigation in Monroe Township illustrate the growing tension among local land-use control, energy concerns, environmental impacts, and statewide economic development objectives. The outcomes of […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

On August 5, New Jersey entered the 90 days before the November 3, 2026 general election. For incumbent officials who are on the ballot, that date activated a longstanding ELEC regulation, N.J.A.C. 19:25-10.10, under which NJ election communications rules can treat routine governmental updates as reportable political activity. Our Public Law group first covered this […]
Author: Mark Tabakin

Industry Faces Continued Uncertainty Ahead of the November 2026 Deadline The U.S. Senate has introduced a funding measure that would temporarily delay implementation of sweeping federal hemp restrictions scheduled to take effect on November 12, 2026. While the proposal provides a potential short-term reprieve for hemp-derived cannabinoid manufacturers, retailers, distributors, and investors, it does not […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

Update (August 2026): For the latest developments in this matter, including the Vineland Planning Board’s review of a self-powered AI campus and Monroe Township’s motion to dismiss, see our updated client alert. New Jersey municipalities are moving aggressively to keep data centers out, and developers are beginning to push back in court. Within the span […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

On June 30, 2026, Governor Mikie Sherrill signed Assembly Bill 5328 (P.L.2026, c.25), establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework governing data brokers and certain businesses that sell or license personal information. While the New Jersey data broker law has garnered attention for imposing annual registration fees that can reach $1.5 million, its significance extends well beyond […]
Author: George McGowan
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!