
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: November 9, 2016

Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.com
In 2010, the State of New Jersey legalized medical marijuana. However, the implementation of the New Jersey Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana Act has been slow, in large part due to the onerous requirements placed on patients and alternative treatment centers seeking to dispense medical marijuana.New Jersey’s first alternative treatment center (ATC) opened in 2012, with two more launching operations in 2013. To date, there are only five licensed medical marijuana dispensaries operating in the state, with one more in the pipeline. While the state is not currently accepting applications to open additional ATCs, it is due to re-evaluate the need to grant additional licenses. In addition, ongoing legislative action to broaden the state’s medical marijuana program may clear the way for new dispensaries. In the event that new dispensaries are to be approved, parties interested in opening dispensaries will need to be familiar and comply with several requirements.
The Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana Act mandates that at least two ATCs be licensed in the northern, central, and southern regions of the State. Under the statute, the first two centers issued a permit in each region must be nonprofit entities, while centers subsequently issued permits may be nonprofit or for-profit entities.
The New Jersey Department of Health requires that entities seeking to obtain an ATC license have a comprehensive business plan. In addition to traditional financial information, applicants must provide details regarding how they plan to track patient data, maintain security at the dispensary, and address the other unique concerns involved with dispensing marijuana.
Below are several types of documents that must be provided in connection with the required Permitting Request Form:
Applicants are required to complete Personal Disclosure Forms, which seek employment, educational, family, and other personal data. Each applicant seeking a permit to operate as an ATC must also submit to fingerprinting and undergo a criminal history record background check. The requirements apply to all owners, directors, officers, and employees. The ATC must also provide written verification of approval by the community or governing body of the municipality in which the ATC entity is or will be located.
Under the Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana Act, the Department of Public Health must approve or deny an application within 60 days after receipt of a completed application. The denial of an application is considered a final agency decision, subject to review by the Appellate Division of the Superior Court.
The foregoing is only a summary of the procedural requirements related to medical marijuana dispensary licenses in New Jersey. Persons interested in the application process should contact a knowledgeable attorney to discuss this process in greater detail.
This article is a part of a series that is covering medical marijuana in New Jersey and the potential of its legalization for recreational use. For more on this topic, check out:
Otherwise, if you have any questions or would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, at 201-806-3364.
Disclaimer: Possession, use, distribution, and/or sale of cannabis is a Federal crime and is subject to related Federal policy. Legal advice provided by Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is designed to counsel clients regarding the validity, scope, meaning, and application of existing and/or proposed cannabis law. Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC will not provide assistance in circumventing Federal or state cannabis law or policy, and advice provided by our office should not be construed as such.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!