Ace Arts has brought a $100 million copyright lawsuit against Sony/ATV Music Publishing and Apple Corps Ltd. for allegedly sabotaging a Beatles documentary film that the company was making.
The company, which is based in the U.S., was producing a Beatles documentary entitled, “The Beatles: The Lost Concert,” using footage from the group’s first concert in the U.S. in 1964. Ace confirmed with Apple Corps that the footage was not under copyright, and later established an agreement with Sony under entertainment law regarding licensing rights. However, Ace is now accusing Sony and Apple Corps of interfering in the filmmaking process, using “spurious copyright infringement threats with respect” to the film.
Ace notes that Sony/ATV – which currently owns rights to a number of Beatles songs – sabotaged a distribution deal that Ace struck with Screenvision before the premiere of the Beatles documentary by making false allegations to Screenvision about Ace’s rights to the material.
“The company that funded, taped, and exhibited the D.C. Concert allowed to film of the concert [the ‘Tape’] to be transferred without copyright protection,” Ace said in court documents. “No copyright was ever filed on the performances recorded on the tape or the tape itself.”
The company alleges that this interference prompted Screenvision to back out of the distribution deal. The company also claimed that Sony/ATV withdrew its license for use of the Beatles songs because it learned that Apple Corps was planning to make and release a similar film featuring the 1964 concert. Apparently, Sony/ATV’s license agreement with Ace Arts was subject to the approval of Apple Corps.
In addition to the $100 million in damages Ace is seeking on the basis of interference with contract and unfair competition, the company also seeks a declaration that neither Sony/ATV nor Apple has any rights that would be infringed by commercial exploitation of the tape, and that Sony misused its copyrights on the songs, according to Court News.
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court.
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal
circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
