Will the Federal Government Establish Policy Regarding Blockchain Technology?
The Federal Reserve Board recently published a research paper entitled, “Distributed Ledger Technology in Payments, Clearing and Settlement.” While not necessarily groundbreaking, the report signals that the federal government is moving towards establishing a national policy regarding blockchain technology.Several years ago, the Federal Reserve indicated that it did not have any plans to regulate digital currency. However, that doesn’t mean the board isn’t paying attention. This fall, Federal Reserve chairwoman Janet Yellen acknowledged the potential of blockchain in remarks before the House Committee on Financial Services. She said, “It could have very significant implications for the payments system and the conduct of business. We want to foster innovation. I think innovation using these technologies could be extremely helpful and bring benefits to society.”
Distributed Ledger Technology
The Federal Reserve report focuses on distributed ledger technology (DLT), which the Fed acknowledges is an imprecise term referring to a “combination of components including peer-to-peer networking, distributed data storage, and cryptography that, among other things, can potentially change the way in which the storage, recordkeeping, and transfer of a digital asset is done.”
The research paper focuses on how the technology can be used in the area of payments, clearing, and settlement, as well as its broader impact on financial markets. It is the product of consultations with 30 key industry stakeholders, including market infrastructures, financial institutions, other government agencies, technology firms, and industry consortia.
“As part of its core objective to foster the safety and efficiency of the payment system and to promote financial stability, the Federal Reserve has a public policy interest in understanding and monitoring the development of innovations that could affect the structural design and functioning of financial markets,” the report states.
Application of the Technology
The Federal Reserve highlights that DLT presents a wealth of opportunities for improving financial transactions, although it is still in its early development stages. “The driving force behind efforts to develop and deploy DLT … is an expectation that the technology could reduce or even eliminate operational and financial inefficiencies, or other frictions, that exist for current methods of storing, recording, and transferring digital assets throughout financial markets,” the report states.
Despite the promise of DLT, the Federal Reserve report notes that the technology must clear several hurdles before it can be widely adopted. Among the challenges that may hamper the practical implementation and potential long-term adoption of blockchain technology, the Federal Reserve cites several business, technology, risk management, and financial design challenges. With regard to risk management, the blockchain report explores a number of business law concerns, including the licensing of companies that provide DLT services, ownership of digital assets, compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and anti-money-laundering (AML) requirements, and the finality of settlements.
For businesses interested in learning more about blockchain technology, the Federal Reserve paper provides a comprehensive overview of the fundamentals. It also surveys many of its potential applications, as well as the potential risks and benefits. As far as future regulation of distributed ledger technology, it appears that the Federal Reserve wants to see how the technology evolves over time before launching an official rulemaking.
This post is a part of a series focusing on blockchain technology, bitcoin and cryptocurrency – more on this can be found below:
Business Mediation: An Overview and Practical Tips
Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation
The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce
The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together
New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Eviction Is Not Always the End: Understanding Post-Possession Rent Claims in New Jersey and New York
No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
