
Paul S. Grossman
Partner
201-896-7110 pgrossman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Paul S. Grossman
Date: August 13, 2026

Partner
201-896-7110 pgrossman@sh-law.com
Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, and what the keys are to a successful mediation.
Key takeaways:
Business mediation, also known as commercial mediation, is a form of alternative dispute resolution. In mediation, a neutral third party is called on to help negotiate differences between the parties’ positions to lead to the settlement of all or some of the issues in dispute. Unlike a judge or jury, the mediator’s role is to help the parties find common ground rather than make a binding decision regarding the dispute. A good mediator will often speak to each party individually, explain to each party what he or she views as the strengths and weaknesses of each party’s case, and suggest creative ways to bridge the parties’ differences. Importantly, in mediation, neither party is obligated to accept the mediator’s recommendation or to resolve the dispute. Litigation always remains an option.
Mediation also differs from litigation in other key ways. While court documents and courtroom proceedings are often public, the mediation process is confidential. In addition, settlement discussions in mediation are generally protected under Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence and applicable mediation privilege rules, such as the New Jersey Uniform Mediation Act, which limit the use of mediation communications in court.
Mediation should also be distinguished from arbitration. While a neutral third party is also appointed to resolve the business dispute in arbitration, an arbitrator will render a decision on the merits of the dispute. That decision is generally final and only subject to appeal under very limited circumstances. Because the arbitrator will render a decision on the merits, the arbitration process tends to be more formal than mediation; nonetheless, it still offers many advantages over litigation, including a faster, less costly resolution.
Mediation is generally voluntary, meaning that the parties are not required to participate. Nonetheless, in complex commercial cases, judges will often urge the parties to first attempt to settle the case via mediation. Even when mediation is court-ordered, the parties typically still select the mediator and the format, determine the issues to be mediated, and decide how much time to devote to mediation.
Although mediation is a flexible process, it often follows similar steps. First, the parties (and their counsel) meet with the mediator to discuss the dispute and determine how the mediation will proceed. On the first day of mediation, each side will sometimes deliver an opening statement, which summarizes their version of the dispute and outlines their desired outcome. The parties may also provide the mediator and the other side with information that supports their position.
The next step of commercial mediation is to work with the mediator to negotiate a resolution. The mediator will encourage open dialogue between the parties, often highlighting areas of common ground and potential solutions. The mediator will then generally meet with each party individually to assess their position, address their concerns, and offer suggestions. This is typically followed by another joint session with both sides.
Should the parties reach an agreement, the mediator will work with them and their attorneys to draft a settlement agreement. After all relevant signatures are obtained, the agreement may be implemented. In some cases, it must also be filed with the court.
If the parties can’t reach a resolution, they can agree to another mediation session or discontinue mediation. In either case, both parties must agree. Finally, even when mediation is not successful at fully resolving the case, it can often narrow the issues that remain in dispute and that require court resolution.
Mediation offers several advantages over litigation. Below are some to consider:
Not all mediations will end in settlement. However, there are steps that you can take to increase the likelihood of a successful resolution. Below are a few tips.
Select the Right Mediator
Once you decide to pursue mediation, selecting a mediator is one of the most important steps in the process. It is important to conduct due diligence, as a poor mediator can sometimes do more harm than good.
When selecting a mediator, key factors include the mediator’s demeanor, training, experience, and success rate. An effective mediator will have a reputation for intelligence, patience, and fairness, while also being forceful enough to keep the process moving forward. If the case involves highly specialized subject matter, it is also important to verify that the mediator has the requisite expertise.
Commit to the Process
For mediation to be effective, the parties must be committed to the process and prepared to make concessions. Simply “going through the motions” will generally not yield a successful resolution. Instead, you must be prepared to put your emotions aside, listen objectively, and remain open to the mediator’s suggestions.
At Scarinci Hollenbeck, attorneys like Paul Grossman work closely with clients to carefully evaluate whether business mediation and other forms of ADR can serve as a viable alternative to traditional court proceedings in their particular dispute. When mediation is used, the attorneys in the firm’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Practice Group leverage their negotiation skills and decades of dispute-resolution experience to advocate on clients’ behalf. To discuss whether mediation is the right path for your dispute, contact Paul Grossman or a member of the firm’s ADR team.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!