
Paul S. Grossman
Partner
201-896-7110 pgrossman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Paul S. Grossman
Date: August 13, 2026

Partner
201-896-7110 pgrossman@sh-law.com
Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, and what the keys are to a successful mediation.
Key takeaways:
Business mediation, also known as commercial mediation, is a form of alternative dispute resolution. In mediation, a neutral third party is called on to help negotiate differences between the parties’ positions to lead to the settlement of all or some of the issues in dispute. Unlike a judge or jury, the mediator’s role is to help the parties find common ground rather than make a binding decision regarding the dispute. A good mediator will often speak to each party individually, explain to each party what he or she views as the strengths and weaknesses of each party’s case, and suggest creative ways to bridge the parties’ differences. Importantly, in mediation, neither party is obligated to accept the mediator’s recommendation or to resolve the dispute. Litigation always remains an option.
Mediation also differs from litigation in other key ways. While court documents and courtroom proceedings are often public, the mediation process is confidential. In addition, settlement discussions in mediation are generally protected under Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence and applicable mediation privilege rules, such as the New Jersey Uniform Mediation Act, which limit the use of mediation communications in court.
Mediation should also be distinguished from arbitration. While a neutral third party is also appointed to resolve the business dispute in arbitration, an arbitrator will render a decision on the merits of the dispute. That decision is generally final and only subject to appeal under very limited circumstances. Because the arbitrator will render a decision on the merits, the arbitration process tends to be more formal than mediation; nonetheless, it still offers many advantages over litigation, including a faster, less costly resolution.
Mediation is generally voluntary, meaning that the parties are not required to participate. Nonetheless, in complex commercial cases, judges will often urge the parties to first attempt to settle the case via mediation. Even when mediation is court-ordered, the parties typically still select the mediator and the format, determine the issues to be mediated, and decide how much time to devote to mediation.
Although mediation is a flexible process, it often follows similar steps. First, the parties (and their counsel) meet with the mediator to discuss the dispute and determine how the mediation will proceed. On the first day of mediation, each side will sometimes deliver an opening statement, which summarizes their version of the dispute and outlines their desired outcome. The parties may also provide the mediator and the other side with information that supports their position.
The next step of commercial mediation is to work with the mediator to negotiate a resolution. The mediator will encourage open dialogue between the parties, often highlighting areas of common ground and potential solutions. The mediator will then generally meet with each party individually to assess their position, address their concerns, and offer suggestions. This is typically followed by another joint session with both sides.
Should the parties reach an agreement, the mediator will work with them and their attorneys to draft a settlement agreement. After all relevant signatures are obtained, the agreement may be implemented. In some cases, it must also be filed with the court.
If the parties can’t reach a resolution, they can agree to another mediation session or discontinue mediation. In either case, both parties must agree. Finally, even when mediation is not successful at fully resolving the case, it can often narrow the issues that remain in dispute and that require court resolution.
Mediation offers several advantages over litigation. Below are some to consider:
Not all mediations will end in settlement. However, there are steps that you can take to increase the likelihood of a successful resolution. Below are a few tips.
Select the Right Mediator
Once you decide to pursue mediation, selecting a mediator is one of the most important steps in the process. It is important to conduct due diligence, as a poor mediator can sometimes do more harm than good.
When selecting a mediator, key factors include the mediator’s demeanor, training, experience, and success rate. An effective mediator will have a reputation for intelligence, patience, and fairness, while also being forceful enough to keep the process moving forward. If the case involves highly specialized subject matter, it is also important to verify that the mediator has the requisite expertise.
Commit to the Process
For mediation to be effective, the parties must be committed to the process and prepared to make concessions. Simply “going through the motions” will generally not yield a successful resolution. Instead, you must be prepared to put your emotions aside, listen objectively, and remain open to the mediator’s suggestions.
At Scarinci Hollenbeck, attorneys like Paul Grossman work closely with clients to carefully evaluate whether business mediation and other forms of ADR can serve as a viable alternative to traditional court proceedings in their particular dispute. When mediation is used, the attorneys in the firm’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Practice Group leverage their negotiation skills and decades of dispute-resolution experience to advocate on clients’ behalf. To discuss whether mediation is the right path for your dispute, contact Paul Grossman or a member of the firm’s ADR team.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!