
Paul S. Grossman
Partner
201-896-7110 pgrossman@sh-law.com
Partner
201-896-7110 pgrossman@sh-law.com
The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and desired outcome, followed by the dispute resolution procedures set out in the franchise agreement, which typically include mediation, arbitration, or litigation.
Key takeaways:
Franchising is a unique and often extremely lucrative business model. In a franchise, a business (the franchisor) licenses its brand and business methods to an individual or business entity operating within a specific territory or location (the franchisee). Under a franchising agreement, the franchisee agrees to operate its business in accordance with the contract. In return, the franchisor typically provides the franchisee with franchising support.
The franchisee generally pays the franchisor a one-time initial franchise fee, as well as a regular royalty fee for the use of the franchisor’s trade name and operating methods. The franchisee is responsible for the day-to-day management of its independently owned franchise and assumes the risk of loss associated with its performance.
Franchise agreements govern the relationship between franchisors and franchisees. These complex contracts contain a variety of important provisions, including those governing:
Before entering into a franchise agreement, both parties need to conduct thorough due diligence on each other and to have a clear understanding of their respective rights and obligations.
A variety of conflicts often arise in the franchise relationship. Some of the most common include:
Disputes often arise when one party alleges that the other has breached the franchise agreement. Examples include failing to pay royalties, making unauthorized use of trademarks, failing to meet revenue goals outlined in the franchise agreement, or improperly terminating the franchise.
Disputes often occur when the initial franchise term ends. Most franchise agreements give the franchisor significant discretion in deciding whether to renew. Often, however, state franchise law provides the franchisee with rights that may override the specific terms of the agreement. If the franchisee believes that a franchisor’s non-renewal decision is unreasonable, it can lead to a lawsuit.
Franchising agreements generally establish the grounds for terminating a franchise, such as an alleged breach. The agreements also outline the termination process that the franchisors must follow, including providing notice and an opportunity to cure the breach. Allegations of wrongful termination can arise if the franchisee challenges the alleged grounds for termination and/or compliance with the required termination process.
Claims of fraud or misrepresentation can arise when one party believes the other provided false or misleading information, such as a franchisor exaggerating potential earnings or a franchisee misrepresenting its financial condition.
Disputes over intellectual property (IP) rights, including trademarks, trade secrets, and copyrights, are also common. Franchisors may allege infringement or unauthorized use of their IP, while franchisees may contend that the franchisor has improperly enforced its IP rights.
Franchise agreements grant franchisees exclusive rights to a certain territory. Disputes can arise if a franchisor allows one franchisee to encroach on another franchisee’s territory.
Franchise agreements typically require franchisors to provide support, such as training, marketing, processes, or remodels. Issues arise when the franchisee believes the franchisor is failing to fulfill its obligations under the contract.
Disputes over royalty payments, advertising fees, and other fees are common. Claims by franchisors include underreporting or non-payment, while franchisees might challenge the basis or calculation of these fees.
Franchise agreements typically require purchasing goods and services from approved suppliers. Disputes can occur if one party allegedly breaches these requirements or engages in unfair or anti-competitive practices related to suppliers/distribution.
Most states have regulations specifically governing the franchise business model. For example, the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act (NJFPA), which is one of the most pro-franchisee acts in the nation, regulates certain aspects of the relationship between franchisees and franchisors. For instance, the NJFPA provides that a franchisor may not terminate or refuse to renew a franchise absent good cause.
Franchisors and franchisees can both benefit from being proactive when a dispute arises. In most cases, the first step is to notify the other party in writing, detailing the nature of the dispute; the outcome you want; and what action will settle the dispute. As with any business dispute, focusing on the facts, rather than emotion, increases the likelihood of resolving the conflict amicably.
If informal discussions do not resolve the franchise dispute, your franchise agreement should outline the next steps. In many cases, the contract will require the parties to engage in a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), such as mediation or arbitration. If ADR is unsuccessful, your franchise agreement will also likely outline the next step in the process, which may be litigation.
A skilled franchise attorney can help you resolve franchise disputes before they cause significant issues for your business. At Scarinci Hollenbeck, we represent franchisors, franchisees, and other business owners in franchise and distribution disputes.
Our multidisciplinary Franchise & Distribution Group has successfully resolved disputes over ownership rights, distribution of franchise revenues and profit, Federal Trade Commission and other regulatory oversight issues, and franchise disclosure documents. Our clients operate across a wide spectrum of industries, including retail, restaurant and hospitality, childcare services, healthcare, and fitness.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!