Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 10, 2023
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comHow long can someone be held in jail awaiting extradition? Under normal circumstances, a charged individual may be imprisoned for up to 30 days awaiting extradition. However, the duration of jail is subject to several factors. For instance, the defendant can stay longer depending on the pending charges.
The Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC can shed light on the extradition process. We also highlight factors that can impact the duration one remains in jail.
The process begins with an extradition request. The requesting country asks to have the fugitive extradited through diplomatic channels. As a rule, the requesting country must provide evidence of the person’s crime.
After lodging the request, legal proceedings take place in the requested country. The proceedings involve a hearing in court. During the hearing, the court weighs the evidence from the requesting country.
The court also considers arguments or objections from the individual’s lawyer. If the judge finds the evidence of guilt to be sufficient, the court orders the individual’s extradition. The process might take weeks or months, or even longer.
An individual can be held in jail for about 30 days. However, the 30-day timeframe is subject to change based on circumstances. Thus, a person can remain in prison for several months before extradition. Some of the factors that dictate the duration of jail include:
The extradition clause of the diplomatic treaty between the two countries determines the duration an individual remains in jail. An efficient extradition process reduces jurisdictional complexities, and correspondingly, jail time before a decision is made.
If the extradition clause is complex, the defendant may stay in jail longer.
When processing extradition requests, authorities focus on the most serious offenses. This prioritizing seeks to ensure that individuals are brought to justice.
Pending cases and investigations also determine the duration an individual stays in jail. For instance, authorities may not immediately extradite an individual in a pending case in the country from which extradition is sought. Instead, they wait until the courts resolve the case.
Moreover, jurisdictions hold fugitives longer if they get multiple extradition requests. With many requests, the authorities hold the alleged offenders in jail for longer to allow enough time to review all submissions.
Extradition becomes complex if the holding and requesting countries lack an extradition treaty. In such scenarios, authorities must navigate multiple legal obstacles to process an extradition request. With the complexities, an individual may stay longer in detention.
Even in cases where an extradition treaty exists, there may be other legal hurdles. For example, some jurisdictions allow fugitives to contest the extradition request. The offender may stay longer in jail awaiting a court decision.
Human rights groups may argue that a fugitive is at risk for human rights violations. The violations can include concerns over the death penalty or inhumane treatment. Moreover, the violations can include the likelihood of an unfair trial. In response, jurisdictions hosting fugitives review each case. Such a review might prolong the time one stays in jail.
How long can someone be held in jail awaiting extradition? One can spend 30 days or several months in prison. The period depends on the crime, existing extradition treaties, and a fugitive’s criminal record.
Whatever the cause of extradition, Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC can help. We serve those in New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Virginia, Georgia, Florida, Puerto Rico, and California.
Contact us to understand your options.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!