Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 10, 2023
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comHow long do SEC investigations take? First, we need to understand them. Simply stated, an SEC investigation is an inquiry by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to determine whether there has been a violation of federal securities laws. The SEC can investigate any person or entity it believes may have violated securities laws. It investigates various securities law violations, including insider trading, fraud, market manipulation, and accounting irregularities.
Investigations are typically initiated based on tips, referrals, and complaints received by the SEC. However, the SEC also has the authority to initiate investigations on its initiative. Once an investigation is complete, the Enforcement Division will decide whether or not to bring enforcement actions against individuals or entities that have violated securities laws.
The SEC issues a formal order of investigation when the Commission believes that there is a reasonable basis to believe that a securities law violation has occurred. Once an order is issued, the Staff of the Division of Enforcement is authorized to subpoena documents and take testimony under oath.
The Staff will report their findings to the Commission, which will then decide whether or not to bring an enforcement action. This Commission comprises five commissioners who are the main decision-making body of the institution on matters regarding investigations.
Are you wondering, “How long do SEC or DOJ investigations take?” The average SEC investigation takes between 12 and 18 months, but some can take several years. However, it may reopen an investigation if new evidence comes to light. It can also extend the statute of limitations if it believes there has been fraud or other criminal activity.
This body is not required to notify individuals or entities that they are under investigation. Often, the first indication that a person or entity has that they are under investigation is when an SEC attorney contacts them.
The statute at 28 USC 2462 provides a five-year limitations period for enforcing any action, suit, or proceeding unless otherwise provided in an act of Congress. This statute can be invoked in various situations, including civil actions brought by private individuals or by the government and all suits brought in federal court. Typically, an SEC investigation falls under this category. However, this rule has some exceptions, such as when the defendant is outside the United States or when the cause of action is based on fraud or misrepresentation.
After the SEC completes its investigation, the SEC may refer the case to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution or bring a civil action in federal court.
The SEC has a wide range of enforcement tools at its disposal, and the action it takes depends on each case’s specific facts and circumstances. In some cases, the SEC may bring an action in federal court, while in others, it may institute an administrative proceeding against you or your business.
If the SEC decides to prosecute you based on the findings of the investigation, it will send you a Wells Notice. This notice details its intention to prosecute. You do not have to respond to the notice, but are permitted to do so.
If you have received a communication from the SEC, it is good that you get experienced securities regulatory legal counsel. The legal counsel may estimate the duration of the investigation and advise you on how to cooperate with the entity. Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC has experienced SEC regulatory and financial crime attorneys who are familiar with the SEC investigative process and can represent you if the investigation leads to civil or criminal prosecution. Contact us today for a consultative meeting.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!