Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 28, 2019
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comProducing a play without obtaining permission from copyright holders can result in significant legal penalties. In a recent copyright suit, Music Theatre International (MTI), which licenses musicals, was awarded $450,000 plus attorney’s fees by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. According to the copyright infringement suit, Theaterpalooza Community Theater Productions, Inc. failed to obtain the proper licenses for several of its productions.

Copyright protection is available for “original works of authorship” fixed in any tangible medium of expression. With regard to the theater industry, the subject matter of copyright includes musical works, including any accompanying words; dramatic works, including any accompanying music; and pantomimes and choreographic works.
Under the 1976 Copyright Act, the copyright owner has the exclusive right to reproduce, adapt, distribute, publicly perform, and publicly display the work. Accordingly, before performing a play, musical or other theatrical work, it is often necessary to obtain legal permission, typically in the form of paying royalties to obtain a license. The requirement applies whether you are a Broadway production, community theater, or local college.
Putting on a copyrighted play without permission can result in significant legal penalties. Federal copyright law establishes statutory fines for each act of copyright infringement, ranging from a minimum of $500 for “innocent” infringements to a maximum of $100,000 for “willful” infringements.
A Virginia youth theatre is on the hook for thousands of dollars in copyright damages after allegedly presenting unlicensed and unauthorized performances of at least 16 well-known musicals, including Roald Dahl’s Willy Wonka, Matilda, Seussical, Little Shop of Horrors, and Honk! MTI, a global theatrical licensing agency, filed suit after receiving no response to numerous requests that the community theater cease the unlicensed performances.
According to a recent court order, Theaterpalooza offers musical theatre classes and camps for children. In addition to charging tuition fees up to $600 per child, Theaterpalooza also charges admission to its final performances, typically $15 for adults and $12 for children. While the theater’s performances often feature well-known plays, it did so without obtaining authorization from the copyright holders.
The court order also concludes that Theaterpalooza was aware of MTI’s copyrights on the musicals as early as January 12, 2015 and continued to perform and advertise unlicensed shows for several years. Accordingly, the court found that Theaterpalooza “willfully infringed” on MTI’s copyrighted works. The order states:
As early as January 12, 2015, Defendant (Theaterpalooza) was aware of Plaintiffs’ (MTI) copyrights and that it was infringing on those rights. Defendant disregarded those rights and continued to perform and advertise copyrighted material. Thus, the undersigned Magistrate Judge finds that Defendant willfully infringed on Plaintiffs’ protected works.
Theaterpalooza has been ordered to pay $489,096.22, consisting of $450,000 of statutory damages, $37,563.50 in attorney’s fees, and $1,532.72 in costs. MTI announced that it plans to donate some of the damages to Jumpstart Theatre, a program created in part by MTI that brings theater programs to underserved communities.
A thorough understanding of copyright law is essential for content creators, such as musicians and playwrights, as well as those that later seek to produce or perform their works. While many older plays and musicals do not require licenses, determining whether material has entered the public domain can be complex. Given the potential penalties for copyright infringement, it is wise to consult with an intellectual property attorney familiar with the theater industry.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, David Einhorn, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!